Oklahoma 2024 Regular Session

Oklahoma Senate Bill SB1786

Introduced
2/5/24  
Refer
2/6/24  
Report Pass
2/20/24  
Engrossed
3/13/24  
Refer
3/25/24  
Report Pass
3/25/24  
Enrolled
4/17/24  

Caption

Student Athlete Name, Image and Likeness Rights Act; modifying requirements for certain contracts and compensation; extending certain liability protections. Effective date. Emergency.

Impact

The legislation will significantly impact the state laws governing collegiate athletics by ensuring that student athletes are not penalized for engaging in endorsements or receiving financial support related to their personal brand. By amending sections of the Oklahoma Statutes, the bill aligns state laws more closely with evolving national standards and practices regarding athlete rights. This legal recognition will empower student athletes by giving them the ability to monetize their image and likeness, similar to professional athletes.

Summary

Senate Bill 1786, titled the Student Athlete Name, Image and Likeness Rights Act, aims to update and clarify the legal framework surrounding the rights of student athletes in Oklahoma. The bill allows student athletes to earn compensation for the use of their name, image, or likeness while enrolled at postsecondary institutions without penalty to their eligibility for athletic grants. The legislation seeks to remove existing prohibitions on certain compensation and professional representation for athletes, promoting an environment where student athletes can financially benefit from their personal brand and marketability.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 1786 appears to be positive among supporters who view it as a necessary step toward fairness and equity for student athletes. Proponents argue that it recognizes the hard work that athletes put into their sports and the revenues they generate for their institutions. However, there are concerns from opponents who fear that increased commercialization could undermine the integrity of college sports, leading to disparities between athletes and institutions. These critics emphasize the need for safeguards to ensure that the interests of educational institutions are protected.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential for conflicts between student athletes and collegiate athletic associations, as the bill seeks to limit the power of these organizations to restrict athletes' earning opportunities. Some lawmakers express concern that this could lead to a fragmented regulatory environment where institutions have varying policies on athlete compensation, potentially disadvantaging some athletes. Additionally, discussions have raised questions about the implications for academic scholarship eligibility and the responsibilities of educational institutions in overseeing and regulating these new rights.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB906

Collegiate athletics: student athlete compensation.

LA SB60

Provides relative to the compensation of intercollegiate athletes for the use of their name, image, or likeness. (gov sig) (EN INCREASE SG EX See Note)

CA SB206

Collegiate athletics: student athlete compensation and representation.

AZ SB1615

Student athletes; employment status; restrictions

CA SB26

Collegiate athletics: student athlete compensation and representation.

MS HB1474

Student-athletes; revise various provisions under the Mississippi Intercollegiate Athletics Compensation Rights Act.