Oregon 2024 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB4149

Introduced
2/5/24  
Refer
2/5/24  
Refer
2/22/24  
Refer
2/22/24  
Report Pass
3/5/24  
Engrossed
3/6/24  
Refer
3/6/24  
Report Pass
3/7/24  
Enrolled
3/7/24  
Passed
4/4/24  
Chaptered
4/10/24  

Caption

Relating to pharmacy benefits; declaring an emergency.

Impact

The bill will have a significant impact on state laws concerning pharmacy operations and consumer rights. In particular, it seeks to limit the ability of PBMs to impose excessive fees or audit practices that could be detrimental to pharmacies. This legislation is positioned to improve the financial viability of pharmacies by ensuring equitable reimbursement for prescription drugs and preventing unfair audits. Additionally, it establishes clear guidelines for the handling of drugs under the 340B program, ensuring that pharmacies can continue to serve underserved populations without financial loss.

Summary

House Bill 4149 aims to reform pharmacy benefit practices in Oregon by amending several statutes related to the operation of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and their contracts with pharmacies. This bill addresses critical issues such as the reimbursement policies for pharmacies, the auditing practices of PBMs, and the handling of 340B drugs, which are medications provided at discounted rates to eligible healthcare providers. The central goal of HB 4149 is to enhance transparency and fairness in the pharmacy benefits landscape, thereby protecting the interests of both pharmacies and consumers.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 4149 is generally supportive among pharmacy professionals and consumer advocacy groups. There is a recognition that the reforms proposed in the bill could lead to a more equitable healthcare system. However, there are concerns from some business interests within the larger healthcare sector who fear that excessive regulation could stifle competition or lead to higher costs. Overall, the discussions tend to focus on the balance between protecting pharmacies and ensuring that consumers receive affordable medication.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the extent to which audit practices are regulated and the implications for pricing transparency in drug reimbursement. Critics of PBM practices argue that the current environment allows for too much discretion that can lead to harmful business practices. Supporters of the bill highlight the necessity of these reforms to prevent predatory behavior by PBMs that disproportionately affect smaller pharmacies. Ultimately, this legislation seeks to rectify these issues and create a more balanced playing field in the pharmacy benefit arena.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MS HB1265

Pharmacists; authorize reimbursement for under certain insurance policies, plans, or contracts.

NJ S2221

Establishes new transparency standards for business of pharmacy benefits managers and establishes licensure requirements.

IL HB4548

INS-PHARMACY BENEFIT MANAGERS

IL HB1159

INS-PHARMACY BENEFIT MANAGERS

MS HB1593

Pharmacy benefit managers; revise provisions relating to.

MS SB2677

Pharmacy Benefit Prompt Pay Act; define requirements for pharmacy benefit managers and pharmacy services administrative organizations.

MS HB1123

Pharmacy benefit managers and pharmacy services administrative organizations; provide certain regulations for.

NM SB14

Pharmacy Benefits Changes