Texas House Bill HB942

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 1/26/11
• Out of House Committee: 3/23/11
• Voted on by House: 4/6/11
• Refer: 2/24/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/12/11
• Report Pass: 3/21/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/19/11
• Engrossed: 4/6/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 4/20/11
• Report Pass: 5/12/11
• Enrolled: 5/21/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to an exemption for school districts from security for court costs and appeal bond.

Impact

The impact of HB 942 is significant for public school systems in Texas. By allowing these districts to sue or appeal without needing to provide a financial guarantee, the bill effectively lowers the risk and cost associated with litigation. This change can empower school districts to defend their interests more vigorously in court, especially in cases involving funding disputes, liability issues, or regulatory challenges. As a result, it could enhance their operational autonomy and ability to carry out educational mandates.

Summary

House Bill 942 aims to provide an exemption for school districts from the requirement to post security for court costs and appeal bonds when they initiate legal actions or appeal judgments. This amendment to the Civil Practice and Remedies Code is intended to facilitate school districts' access to the courts without the financial barrier posed by these security requirements. Under this bill, school districts can pursue legal matters freely, which is particularly important given the unique challenges they often face in legal proceedings.

Contention

While the bill appears to offer a straightforward benefit to school districts, there could be points of contention regarding its implications. Some critics may express concern over the potential for increased litigation as school districts, unburdened by financial prerequisites, may choose to engage in more legal actions. Additionally, there may be debates surrounding the fairness of such exemptions compared to the requirements imposed on other entities involved in legal disputes. Overall, the discourse around HB 942 might reflect broader discussions on education funding and the role of public institutions in litigation.