Texas Senate Bill SB31

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 5/13/11
• Introduced: 1/3/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/17/11
• Refer: 1/31/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/18/11
• Voted on by House: 5/21/11
• Engrossed: 5/17/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 5/17/11
• Report Pass: 5/18/11
• Enrolled: 5/21/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the composition of the districts for the election of members of the Texas Senate.

Impact

The bill's implementation would significantly impact the electoral framework in Texas, as it supersedes all prior enactments regarding Senate district compositions. By establishing new districts, SB31 facilitates a systematic review and reallocation of representation that reflects demographic changes within the state. This systematic approach aims to provide equitable representation across diverse populations, ensuring that each district adequately represents its constituents based on current population data and demographic insights.

Summary

SB31 is a legislative bill aimed at redefining the composition of electoral districts for the election of members to the Texas Senate. The bill outlines specific geographic areas designated as electoral districts, emphasizing the need for updated district boundaries based on the latest census data. Each district is designated a unique identifier within the redistricting computer system managed by the Texas Legislative Council, which serves to maintain updated records of electoral boundaries and ensure compliance with state legislation in the administration of elections.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding SB31 appears to reflect a broader understanding of the importance of fair representation and adaptive governance in Texas. Proponents of the bill likely view it positively as a necessary adaptation to demographic shifts that will enhance electoral integrity. However, concerns may arise regarding potential gerrymandering or disproportionate representation, highlighting the delicate balance legislators must maintain between effective governance and equitable representation.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB31 may revolve around interpretations of what constitutes fair district composition and whether the new boundaries serve the best interests of the populace. Discussions may arise about the potential for certain districts to gain or lose representation based on the newly defined boundaries. Additionally, discrepancies in demographic representation within districts could provoke debate amongst stakeholders about the implications of the new boundaries on future elections and legislative effectiveness.