Texas Senate Bill SB1693

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to the management of federal and state funds for the Texas Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program, and other programs directed toward the accommodation of pedestrians, bicyclists, persons with disabilities, children, senior citizens, users of public transportation, and persons of all ages and abilities on separate facilities and in conjunction with motorists on street and highway corridors, hereafter the "All-Ages, Active, Safe, and Economical Transportation in Texas (AASETT)" program.

Impact

The passage of SB1693 could lead to substantial changes in state laws governing transportation funding and infrastructure. By prioritizing SRTS and AASETT projects, the bill aims to ensure that critical funding is directed towards making roads safer for students traveling to and from school and for other vulnerable road users. This could result in increased investment in sidewalks, bike lanes, and other necessary infrastructure improvements, significantly impacting local communities by potentially reducing accidents and promoting active transportation.

Summary

SB1693 focuses on the management and allocation of federal and state funds for the Texas Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program as well as for the All-Ages, Active, Safe, and Economical Transportation in Texas (AASETT) program. The bill aims to enhance transportation safety for a variety of users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, individuals with disabilities, children, and senior citizens. By establishing specific guidelines for how funds can be managed, the bill's intent is to create a more comprehensive approach to transportation infrastructure that accommodates all ages and abilities.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB1693 appears to be positive amongst advocates for pedestrian and cyclist safety, as well as among educators who understand the importance of safe routes for children. Stakeholders in transportation and urban planning emphasize the need for such measures, which reflect a growing recognition of the importance of multi-modal transportation. However, there may be some contention among community groups who feel existing infrastructure inadequacies could be overlooked if funds are not managed appropriately.

Contention

One notable point of contention regarding SB1693 may revolve around the allocation of funding and the criteria for selecting specific projects. Concerns could arise regarding whether the funds will be equitably distributed across urban, suburban, and rural areas, as well as how local needs and priorities will be addressed amidst state-level mandates. The emphasis on SRTS and AASETT projects may overshadow the necessity for a 'Complete Streets' approach, which provides a balanced focus on both motorized and non-motorized transport needs.