Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB932

Filed
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 

Caption

Relating to the authority of the Public Utility Commission of Texas to retain assistance for federal proceedings affecting certain electric utilities and consumers.

Impact

The legislation strategically updates the Utilities Code to specify the parameters within which the PUCT can operate. It sets a cap on the total costs that can be incurred by electric utilities for retaining such assistance to $1.5 million within a 12-month period, ensuring that these expenditures are reasonable and subject to approval. Additionally, this bill allows utilities to recover these costs through an annual rider, which will be reviewed and approved by the commission, adding a layer of fiscal oversight. This may result in a more efficient recovery process for electric utilities while also being mindful of consumer costs.

Summary

SB932 aims to enhance the authority of the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) to retain external support for federal proceedings affecting electric utilities and consumers. Specifically, the bill allows the PUCT to hire consultants, accountants, auditors, engineers, or attorneys to assist in matters presented before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or in court concerning issues related to electric utilities. This increased authority is intended to ensure that the commission has adequate resources to navigate complex federal regulatory environments effectively, ultimately aiming to safeguard consumers’ interests and the integrity of the state's electric utility management.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB932 appears to be professional and supportive among utility regulatory circles, as it addresses a crucial aspect of regulatory compliance and consumer protection. However, there could be potential pushback from consumer advocacy groups concerned about the implications of cost recovery and the possible burden on consumers if these costs are passed down. Regulatory experts and utility operators usually advocate for such measures to maintain strong oversight mechanisms in a changing regulatory landscape.

Contention

While the legislation seeks to bolster the PUCT's capabilities, certain concerns arise regarding the transparency and accountability of the costs that will be assessed to consumers. Critics may argue that while hiring external experts is sometimes necessary, it is critical to maintain strict limits on how these costs are determined and the process by which they can be passed through to consumers. The expiration date for certain provisions in the bill, set for September 1, 2023, indicates that the effectiveness of these regulations will warrant further review and potential amendments within the upcoming legislative sessions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

IL SB2087

STATES ATTY-PEACE OFCR-PRIVACY

IL SB3671

STATES ATTY-PEACE OFCR-PRIVACY

CA SB605

State attorneys and administrative law judges: compensation.

CA AB1163

Minors: power of attorney to care for a minor child.

CA SB1109

Adoption.

CA SB710

District attorneys: conflicts of interest.

CA AB2083

Public utilities: rates.

CA AB894

Attorney General: directors and employees: exemption from civil service.