Texas Senate Bill SB247

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

• Filed: 11/18/16

Caption

Relating to funding sources for the repayment of certain speech-language pathologist and audiologist education loans.

Impact

The implementation of SB247 is anticipated to positively affect the number of professionals entering the fields of speech-language pathology and audiology. By creating a structured repayment fund, the bill provides financial relief that could encourage students to pursue these educational paths. Additionally, the bill aims to enhance access to speech-language services within the state, addressing a critical need in healthcare and education sectors where professionals are often in short supply.

Summary

Senate Bill 247 aims to establish and clarify funding sources for the repayment of educational loans specifically for speech-language pathologists and audiologists. By amending existing legislation, the bill allows for these funding sources to include not only gifts and grants but also a portion of fees collected under certain occupational regulations, provided that there is no increase in fees for those regulated. This legislative effort is part of a broader initiative to support healthcare professionals in these specialized fields by alleviating the financial burdens associated with their education.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB247 is favorable among stakeholders in the education and healthcare sectors. Legislators advocating for the bill recognize the importance of supporting speech-language pathologists and audiologists, whose roles are crucial in enhancing communication skills for many individuals, including those with speech and hearing impairments. While the bill received support, there remain voices of caution regarding the sustainability of the funding sources and potential impacts on regulatory fee structures.

Contention

One point of contention in the discussions around SB247 relates to the balance of funding between private contributions and regulated fees. Some critics express concerns about relying on a portion of occupational fees, fearing it might unduly burden other healthcare professionals already facing financial constraints. The bill attempts to mitigate these concerns by ensuring that the allocation does not result in increased fees, but it still raises questions about the long-term stability and equitable distribution of resources across various healthcare professions.