Texas Senate Bill SB870

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to the scheduling by an appraisal review board of a hearing on a protest.

Impact

The implications of SB 870 are significant as it modifies the existing Texas Tax Code, particularly Section 41.71. By allowing for evening and weekend hearings, the bill seeks to improve taxpayer engagement and streamline the protest process. This adjustment could lead to a more efficient resolution of disputes between property owners and appraisal entities, potentially increasing public trust in the appraisal system by ensuring that more individuals have the opportunity to participate in hearings.

Summary

Senate Bill 870, filed by Senator Bettencourt, proposes amendments to the scheduling procedures for hearings on protests before an appraisal review board in Texas. Specifically, the bill mandates that these boards provide options for hearings during the evening or on Saturdays, with the exception that no hearings can occur on Sundays. This change aims to enhance accessibility for taxpayers wishing to contest property appraisals outside of regular business hours, recognizing the challenges many face in attending daytime hearings due to work and other commitments.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding SB 870 appears favorable as it aligns with broader efforts to promote transparency and accessibility in governmental processes. Supporters of the bill emphasize the importance of accommodating the schedules of working taxpayers and reducing barriers to participation in the protest process. Overall, the reception of the bill seems to reflect a commitment to enhancing public involvement in local governance and appraisal matters.

Contention

While the bill's provisions largely support accessibility, there may be some concerns regarding the implications for appraisal review boards' operational capacities. Critics may question whether the flexibility in scheduling could lead to logistical challenges or increased costs for boards tasked with organizing hearings. However, these concerns do not appear to have significantly detracted from the general support for the measure, as the focus remains on the important goal of taxpayer accessibility to the hearing process.