Texas Senate Bill SB900

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to penalties for certain family violence offenses and for assultive offenses against certain persons; imposing court costs.

Impact

The enactment of SB900 would have a significant impact on how family violence is addressed under Texas law. By adding specific penalties for repeat offenders, the bill would likely change the legal landscape surrounding family violence cases. For instance, it establishes a minimum period of confinement for offenses committed against certain familial relationships, particularly when children are present. This amendment signifies a proactive approach towards protecting vulnerable populations, particularly children who may witness domestic violence situations.

Summary

SB900, introduced in Texas, aims to enhance penalties for repeat family violence offenders and establish specific court costs associated with such offenses. The bill modifies the Penal Code by introducing a new section specifically targeting individuals previously convicted of family violence offenses. Under this legislation, repeat offenders would face more severe felony charges, reflecting a growing concern over the impact of domestic violence within communities. The bill seeks to deter family violence while also ensuring that repeat offenders face more substantial consequences for their actions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB900 appears to be largely supportive from advocates for domestic abuse victims. Many community leaders and social activists have lauded the bill as a necessary step towards enhancing the legal responses to family violence. Conversely, there may be concerns raised about the potential overreach of the legislation and its implications on judicial discretion. Critics might argue that the bill could inadvertently contribute to incarceration rates without adequate consideration of rehabilitative measures for offenders.

Contention

Notable points of contention relate to the balance between punishment and support for repeat offenders. The introduction of mandatory confinement for certain misdemeanors might spark debates over appropriate sentencing reforms. Additionally, the requirement for defendants to pay court costs that contribute to a family violence prevention fund raises questions about the equitable distribution of these funds and their effectiveness in addressing the root causes of family violence.