Texas House Bill HB1113

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Relating to state contract limitations and programs for sex trafficking prevention and victim treatment.

Impact

The implementation of HB1113 would significantly alter the landscape of state contracting by embedding stricter regulations targeting vendors involved in human trafficking activities. The bill not only seeks to prevent such entities from participating in state contracts but also emphasizes the state's commitment to sex trafficking prevention through designated treatment programs for victims. Moreover, it establishes a matching grant program that enables municipalities to develop needs assessments and preventive programs, highlighting a collaborative approach to local governance and public safety.

Summary

House Bill 1113 aims to enhance the state's efforts in combatting human trafficking by establishing limitations on state contracts to ensure that individuals or entities involved in human trafficking do not benefit from state funds. Specifically, the bill prohibits state agencies from accepting bids or awarding contracts to those who have been convicted of offenses related to the support or promotion of human trafficking within the preceding five years. This provision reflects a stronger stance by the state on preventing human trafficking and minimizing the potential for state funds to inadvertently support such activities.

Sentiment

The general sentiment regarding HB1113 is positive among proponents who view it as a necessary measure to safeguard public funds and support vulnerable populations. Advocates, including various nonprofit organizations, expressed that the bill represents a meaningful step towards addressing the pressing issue of human trafficking in Texas. Conversely, there may be concerns from certain local governments and potential vendors about the implications of stringent contract qualifications, particularly regarding how these new regulations could impact participation in future state contracts.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding HB1113 relates to the balance between imposing necessary restrictions on contractors and ensuring that local businesses are not unduly burdened by overly strict regulations. Stakeholders are concerned about how the bill's enforcement mechanisms will be rolled out and whether adequate resources will be allocated to support municipalities in developing effective sex trafficking prevention programs. The effectiveness of such programs hinges not only on initial funding but also on sustained community engagement and awareness efforts.