Texas Senate Bill SR847

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Suspending limitations on conference committee jurisdiction on SB 20.

Impact

The bill modifies the existing statutes concerning state contracts, making sure that state agencies do not accept bids from individuals or entities that have been involved in human trafficking. This provision is intended to ensure that state resources are not allocated to those who have previously violated laws related to human trafficking. Additionally, the bill establishes grant programs for municipal sex trafficking prevention programs, which enables localities to develop tailored strategies based on their specific needs, potentially leading to more effective local responses to these crimes.

Summary

Senate Resolution 847 (SR847) was passed in Texas to suspend certain limitations on the conference committee's jurisdiction regarding Senate Bill 20. This bill primarily focuses on improving the reporting and investigation of human trafficking and related criminal offenses, as well as enhancing the treatment and compensation available to victims of such crimes. A significant aspect of SR847 is its emphasis on establishing mechanisms to prevent sex trafficking and providing resources for victims, thereby looking to reduce the societal impacts of these offenses.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SR847 was largely positive, with bipartisan support observed during discussions. Proponents argued that the legislation was a necessary step towards tackling the serious issue of human trafficking effectively, stressing that it would enhance public safety and support victims in need. However, some concerns were raised about the implementation mechanisms and whether the allocated funding would be sufficient to meet the needs of these programs.

Contention

Notably, there were some contentions related to the operational aspects of the provisions laid out in the resolution. Critics pointed to concerns over the transparency and oversight regarding the allocation of funds and contract awards, emphasizing the need for rigorous monitoring to ensure that the intended goals of preventing human trafficking are met. The emphasis on state versus local control also sparked debate regarding the effectiveness of a centralized approach in addressing such complex societal issues.