Texas House Bill HR2198

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Suspending limitations on conference committee jurisdiction, S.B. No. 20.

Impact

The passage of HR2198 supports the state's efforts to combat human trafficking by creating frameworks for prevention, law enforcement training, and victim support services. Specifically, it outlines the establishment of matching grant programs for municipalities to align with local educational institutions to develop comprehensive assessments of their trafficking needs. Such measures aim to better equip communities in identifying and reducing instances of trafficking, ultimately fostering a more collaborative environment between state and local governments regarding public safety and welfare.

Summary

House Resolution 2198, adopted by the Texas House on May 26, 2019, primarily aims to suspend certain limitations on conference committee jurisdiction to facilitate amendments related to Senate Bill 20, which addresses the prevention and penalties related to human trafficking. This action allows the conference committee to discuss and make alterations, ensuring that critical provisions regarding the treatment of trafficking victims are effectively integrated into the legislative process. The bill emphasizes collaboration between state agencies and local entities to enhance the effectiveness of anti-trafficking measures across Texas.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HR2198 was largely positive, reflecting a bipartisan recognition of the urgency to address human trafficking in Texas. Legislators expressed optimism that the amendments would lead to enhanced support for victims and increased accountability for offenders. However, some concerns arose regarding the implementation and funding of the proposed grant programs, indicating a need for adequate financial resources to realize the bill's objectives effectively.

Contention

Notable points of contention included discussions on the mechanisms for ensuring the proposed programs maintained local control while also being effectively managed at the state level. Legislators debated the balance between empowering local governments to tailor solutions to their unique challenges while providing sufficient oversight and support from state agencies. This conversation highlighted the ongoing conflict in legislative approaches concerning local autonomy versus statewide governance, particularly in sensitive areas like human trafficking.