Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Texas House Bill HB4504

Caption

Relating to the appointment of certain judicial offices, a board for considering the qualification of applicants for judicial office, and a nonpartisan election for the retention or rejection of a person appointed to those offices.

Impact

This bill has significant implications for the appointment of judges in Texas. It introduces a process whereby a board reviews judicial candidates based on their qualifications before they are confirmed by the Senate. Additionally, it mandates nonpartisan retention elections for certain judicial offices, creating a system where judges must periodically seek approval from voters to remain in office. This shift toward increased accountability may alter the dynamics of how justices operate within the judiciary and interact with the electorate.

Summary

House Bill 4504 aims to amend the Government and Election Codes of Texas by establishing a Judicial Appointments Advisory Board. This board is intended to review the qualifications of judicial appointees and provide assessments to the Texas Senate. The legislation stipulates that the board will consist of members representing both major parties, as well as appointed members from the state's legal community and the judiciary. The goal of these changes is to enhance the scrutiny and transparency surrounding judicial appointments, ensuring a qualified judiciary that can maintain public trust.

Contention

While proponents argue that this system will elevate the integrity and competence of the judiciary, critics express concerns over the potential for political influence in what is intended to be a nonpartisan process. The concept of judicial retention elections can also be contentious, raising debates about the role of public opinion in judicial independence. Overall, the bill reflects ongoing discussions about the effectiveness and accountability of judicial processes in Texas.

Companion Bills

TX HJR148

Enabling for Proposing a constitutional amendment providing for appointments to fill vacancies for certain judicial offices and for nonpartisan retention elections for those offices.

Similar Bills

TX HB1999

Relating to the nonpartisan election of district judges.

TX SB2226

Relating to filling vacancies in appellate judicial offices by appointment, partisan elections for all judicial offices, and nonpartisan elections for the retention or rejection for all judicial offices.

TX SB1718

Relating to filling vacancies in appellate judicial offices by appointment, partisan elections for all judicial offices, and nonpartisan elections for the retention or rejection for all judicial offices.

TX HB3710

Relating to filling vacancies in appellate judicial offices by appointment, partisan elections for all judicial offices, and nonpartisan elections for the retention or rejection for all judicial offices.

TX SB577

Relating to filling vacancies in appellate judicial offices by appointment, partisan elections for all judicial offices, and nonpartisan elections for the retention or rejection for all judicial offices.

CA AB868

Primary elections: county officers: top two candidates.

GA HB674

Elections; nonpartisan elections of certain governing authorities; provisions

GA SB14

Elections; the nonpartisan election of district attorneys and solicitors-general of state courts; authorize the General Assembly