Texas Senate Bill SCR56

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Granting the legislature permission to adjourn for more than three days during the period beginning on Wednesday, March 27, 2019, and ending on Monday, April 1, 2019.

Impact

The passage of SCR56 modifies the standing rules that govern legislative adjournment in Texas, allowing for greater flexibility in the legislature's schedule. By permitting a longer adjournment interval, it enables lawmakers to manage their time more effectively and can facilitate a detailed analysis of pending legislation, committee work, and other necessary governmental functions. Ultimately, this resolution impacts how legislative time is allocated, potentially affecting how swiftly bills and resolutions are processed during the session, which can have downstream effects on constituents awaiting legislative outcomes.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution 56 (SCR56) aims to address the legislative adjournment procedure outlined in the Texas Constitution. Specifically, it seeks to grant permission for both houses of the Texas Legislature to adjourn for a period exceeding three days without the consent of the other house. This resolution outlines the time frame for the adjournment as beginning on March 27, 2019, and ending on April 1, 2019. Such a measure is typically proposed to manage legislative schedules and ensure the efficient conduct of business, especially during critical sessions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR56 appears to be overwhelmingly positive, as indicated by its adoption with unanimous votes in both the Senate and the House, where it passed 31-0 and 147-0 respectively. This high level of support among legislators suggests a shared recognition of the need for procedural flexibility during the legislative session. Since it did not face opposition or contention during discussions, it reflects a general consensus about the importance of efficient legislative operation in meeting the state's governance needs.

Contention

Notably, because SCR56 addresses legislative procedure rather than substantive policy, it encountered minimal controversy or debate. The resolution's straightforward intent to allow for necessary adjournment reflects a procedural theme that is typically well-received in legislative contexts. The unanimous support signals a collaborative atmosphere among legislators, focused on optimizing the legislative process rather than confronting divisive policy issues.