Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Texas House Bill HB3104

Filed
2/20/25  
Out of House Committee
4/23/25  
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the appointment and compensation of a bailiff appointed by the judges of certain district courts in Webb County.

Impact

The bill's passage is expected to streamline the process of appointing bailiffs in the specified district courts while also establishing a clear compensation framework. By codifying these provisions into law, the bill aims to ensure consistency in the treatment of bailiffs across the jurisdictions affected. This move is designed to enhance the efficiency of the judicial process while also clarifying the roles and responsibilities of those appointed to these positions.

Summary

House Bill 3104 seeks to regulate the appointment and compensation of bailiffs in certain district courts in Webb County. The bill proposes amendments to Section 53.001 of the Government Code, specifying which judges are allowed to appoint bailiffs and detailing the compensation structure for these positions. Notably, it excludes the judges of the 341st and 406th district courts from the new appointment and compensation guidelines, allowing prior arrangements to continue for bailiffs appointed before the bill's effective date.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 3104 appeared largely supportive, with a substantial majority of legislators voting in favor of the bill, as indicated by a near-unanimous vote during its passage (139 yeas to 1 nay). This level of support suggests a general consensus on the need for reform in the area of bailiff appointments and compensation, although there remains some criticism regarding the exclusion of specific district judges from the new rules.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding the bill revolved around the decision to exempt judges of the 341st and 406th district courts from the new provisions. Critics expressed concerns that this could create a disparity in the treatment of bailiffs across different courts in the same jurisdiction, potentially leading to confusion and inequities in their compensation and appointment processes. Nonetheless, proponents argue that maintaining existing arrangements for these courts is a necessary compromise for ensuring the smooth integration of the new regulations.

Texas Constitutional Statutes Affected

Government Code

  • Chapter 53. Bailiffs
    • Section: 009
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.