Relating to the confidentiality of certain personal information in the custody of certain law enforcement and health care agencies of this state.
Impact
The introduction of HB4484 could significantly impact how personal information is managed by state law enforcement and health care agencies. With the stipulated protections, there will be a heightened assurance for citizens that their sensitive information will be shielded from public disclosure, aligning state policies with broader trends towards enhancing privacy rights and data protection. This move could strengthen public trust in state agencies, as individuals may feel more secure in providing their details knowing they are confidential. Importantly, this change in law applies to requests for information received on or after the bill's effective date, which is crucial for determining its application and impact.
Summary
House Bill 4484 proposes amendments to the Government Code regarding the confidentiality of certain personal information held by specific state agencies, particularly the Department of Public Safety, the Department of State Health Services, and the Health and Human Services Commission. The bill specifically aims to protect sensitive data, including sex, date of birth, and home addresses, that individuals provide to these agencies. This initiative is positioned as a response to ongoing concerns about privacy and data security, particularly in relation to personal information shared in the context of obtaining or updating state identification documents or health care services.
Contention
Discussion surrounding HB4484 may revolve around the balance between transparency and privacy. While the bill sets forth necessary protections for personal information, critics may raise concerns regarding the implications for information access by the public or potential obstruction of law enforcement activities. Ensuring that data confidentiality does not hinder law enforcement’s capabilities or health services' operational transparency will be critical. Additionally, there might be debates over the effectiveness of enforced confidentiality measures and whether they adequately address the risks posed by data breaches and misuse of personal information.
Relating to the confidentiality of certain information for employees of a county courthouse or the Office of Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System and the employees' family members.
Relating to the confidentiality of certain information for a current or former administrative law judge for the State Office of Administrative Hearings.
Relating to certain laws that regulate aspects of illegal immigration in this state, including laws pertaining to the DNA records of certain persons subject to an immigration detainer request, the recognition of certain out-of-state driver's licenses, inviting certain federal agencies to participate on the homeland security council, the reporting of certain uncompensated hospital care costs, and certain requirements for participation in the E-verify program; increasing a criminal penalty.