Us Congress House Bill HJR131

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/26/24
• Refer: 4/26/24
• Refer: 5/3/24

Caption

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for Model Years 2027 and Later Light-Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles".

Impact

If passed, HJR131 would effectively nullify the EPA's current proposal, which seeks to regulate emissions from light-duty and medium-duty vehicles conforming to specific multi-pollutant standards. This disapproval could lead to a major shift in how emissions are regulated at the federal level, with states possibly left to formulate their individual standards if the federal regulation does not apply. Consequently, the resolution could pave the way for increased pollution from vehicles, raising concerns among environmental advocates about the potential adverse effects on air quality and public health.

Summary

HJR131 is a joint resolution aimed at disapproving the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding 'Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for Model Years 2027 and Later Light-Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles.' This resolution highlights a legislative attempt to prevent the implementation of new automotive emissions standards proposed by the EPA, which may affect compliance requirements for vehicle manufacturers and their emissions outputs. Supporters of this joint resolution argue that it is essential for addressing regulatory overreach by federal agencies, promoting a less restrictive environment for the automotive industry.

Contention

The primary points of contention surrounding HJR131 revolve around the balance between environmental protection and economic interests. Supporters of the resolution argue that stringent regulations imposed by the EPA may stifle innovation and increase costs for manufacturers, which could ultimately burden consumers with higher vehicle prices. Conversely, opponents contend that rescinding these emissions standards undermines significant progress made in recent years towards cleaner air and poses risks to both the environment and public health. The discussions around this resolution highlight the ongoing debate between economic growth and environmental responsibility.