A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Justice and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives relating to "Factoring Criteria for Firearms With Attached 'Stabilizing Braces'".
The resolution, if passed, would nullify the current rule governing stabilizing braces, which are often used to enhance the stability of firearms. Advocates of SJR20 argue that the original regulation overreaches by potentially restricting lawful firearm use and ownership. They claim it is an unnecessary measure that could infringe on Second Amendment rights, suggesting that the ruling could penalize responsible gun owners who utilize stabilizing braces for legitimate purposes.
SJR20 is a joint resolution aimed at disapproving a specific rule submitted by the Department of Justice and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives regarding 'Factoring Criteria for Firearms With Attached Stabilizing Braces.' This rule was published in the Federal Register and relates to the criteria used for determining whether certain firearms modifications classify the firearm as a short-barreled rifle under existing law. The resolution seeks to prevent this rule from taking effect, citing concerns over its implications for firearm ownership and regulation.
Notable contention surrounding SJR20 arises from the differing perspectives on gun ownership and regulation. Proponents of the resolution view the DOJ's rule as a bureaucratic overstep that could lead to unjust penalties for firearm users, particularly those who rely on stabilizing braces for improved handling. Opponents of the resolution, however, may argue that regulating these devices is essential for public safety and controlling firearm modifications that could be deemed hazardous. The discussion reflects broader tensions in national gun policy, particularly in the context of heightened calls for stricter gun control measures.