Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

Us Congress House Bill HB202

Introduced
1/3/25  

Caption

Commission to Relocate the Federal Bureaucracy ActThis bill establishes a commission to study the relocation of nonsecurity-related federal agencies based in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area to other areas throughout the United States. Within one year of the bill's enactment the commission must submit a report to Congress that includes relocation recommendations based on specified considerations.

Impact

The impact of HB 202 is primarily aimed at streamlining government operations and potentially reducing operational costs associated with the high cost of living in the D.C. region. Supporters argue that relocating agencies could lead to better resource management and allow federal employees to enjoy more affordable living conditions in other parts of the country. This might also facilitate the decentralization of federal presence and promote regional economic development in areas where agencies are relocated.

Summary

House Bill 202, titled the 'Commission to Relocate the Federal Bureaucracy Act', seeks to establish a commission that will study the potential relocation of specific federal government agencies from the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area to other regions in the United States. The bill identifies various factors to be considered in making relocation recommendations, such as financial efficiency, infrastructure availability, and the surrounding industries that could support these agencies. Additionally, it highlights the role of telework in the relocation feasibility, reflecting changes in workforce dynamics post-pandemic.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill include concerns about the effectiveness of agency operations in new locations and the potential disruption to established systems and practices. Critics may argue that relocation could lead to inefficiencies and difficulties in retaining talent who are accustomed to the current environment. Furthermore, the potential impact on local economies and communities, as well as the implications for federal employee morale and productivity, are likely to be contentious issues as discussions about the bill evolve. The bill also raises questions about federal oversight and the balance of power between the federal government and state jurisdictions.

Congress_id

119-HR-202

Policy_area

Government Operations and Politics

Introduced_date

2025-01-03

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB493

District agricultural associations: secretary-managers: compensation.

LA HB528

Reforms the organizational structure for the Department of Transportation and Development including its duties, powers, and responsibilities of officers and employees (EG INCREASE GF EX See Note)

AR SB63

To Amend Arkansas Law Concerning Reports By The Secretaries Of Cabinet-level Departments On The State Of Their Departments.

CA AB655

California-Mexico Border Relations Council.

CA SB297

Elections: initiatives and referenda: withdrawal.

MI HB4268

Campaign finance: violations; secretary of state to apply for injunctive relief; allow. Amends sec. 15 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.215).

CA AB459

Initiatives: qualification: electronic signatures.

IA SF479

A bill for an act relating to documents filed with the secretary of state by business entities, including by authorizing the secretary of state to refuse to file documents or remove information from documents.