Virginia 2024 Regular Session

Virginia Senate Bill SB47

Introduced
12/21/23  
Refer
12/21/23  
Report Pass
1/22/24  
Engrossed
1/24/24  
Engrossed
1/25/24  
Refer
2/13/24  
Report Pass
2/16/24  
Enrolled
2/26/24  

Caption

Firearm; transfers to another person from a prohibited person.

Impact

The implications of SB47 are significant as it seeks to enhance public safety by ensuring firearms do not remain in the possession of individuals who may pose a risk to themselves or others, particularly in cases involving domestic violence. By instituting stricter controls over firearm ownership associated with protective orders, the bill aims to mitigate the potential for further violence. Law enforcement agencies will also play a crucial role in overseeing the surrender and storage of firearms from prohibited individuals, which establishes a clear procedure for managing such situations.

Summary

SB47 addresses the issues related to firearm possession by individuals under protective orders in Virginia. The bill amends existing laws to explicitly prohibit those subject to protective orders from purchasing or transporting firearms while the order is in effect. Additionally, it requires individuals to surrender any firearms they possess within a specified timeframe after being served the protective order. Enforcement mechanisms include penalties for non-compliance, categorizing violations as misdemeanors or felonies depending on the circumstances.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB47 appears to be largely supportive among proponents of stricter gun control measures, who argue that the bill is an essential step in protecting victims of domestic violence. However, there are dissenting views, particularly among gun rights advocates who express concerns over due process and the potential for overreach in state intervention regarding individual firearm rights. This polarization reflects ongoing debates about the balance between public safety and personal freedoms.

Contention

Notable points of contention center around the enforcement of the bill and the implications for individuals who may be wrongfully accused, due to the potential for firearms to be seized and the resulting stigma. Critics argue that the bill may disproportionately affect those who face false allegations or are unable to navigate the legal complexities involved in reclaiming their rights post-restriction. Additionally, there are concerns about the administrative burden placed on law enforcement agencies tasked with managing the firearm surrender process.

Companion Bills

VA HB46

Similar To Firearm; transfers to another person from a prohibited person.

Similar Bills

VA HB1960

Firearm transfers to another person from a prohibited person.

VA SB744

Firearm transfers to another person from a prohibited person.

VA HB46

Firearm; transfers to another person from a prohibited person.

VA SB909

Firearms; transfers to another person from a prohibited person.

VA HB1729

Firearms; transfers to another person from a prohibited person.

CA AB1127

Interdistrict attendance: prohibition on transfers by a school district of residence.

CA AB3086

Interdistrict attendance: prohibition on transfers by a school district of residence.

CA AB1408

Intradistrict and interdistrict transfers: low-performing pupils.