Wisconsin Senate Bill SB136

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/23/23
• Refer: 3/23/23
• Report Pass: 9/29/23
• Engrossed: 10/17/23
• Refer: 12/6/23
• Enrolled: 1/30/24
• Chaptered: 3/14/24
• Passed: 3/14/24

Caption

Modifying administrative rules related to supplemental aid for snowmobile trail maintenance and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Impact

The enactment of SB136 could significantly impact local governments and organizations involved in snowmobile trail maintenance throughout Wisconsin. By establishing a clearer framework administratively, the bill aims to ensure that supplemental aid is distributed more equitably and efficiently. Counties that qualify for this aid will need to align their budgeting and maintenance strategies with the new caps on financial assistance. Overall, the bill is expected to improve the upkeep of snowmobile trails while controlling state spending on trail maintenance.

Summary

Senate Bill 136 (SB136) aims to modify administrative rules related to supplemental aid for snowmobile trail maintenance in Wisconsin. Specifically, the bill proposes the establishment of new rule-making authority for the Department. It allows for the limitation of aid amounts to five times the per mile maximum defined for maintenance, thus introducing a cap on the financial assistance that counties can receive for snowmobile trail maintenance activities. This legislative change is intended to enhance the management of snowmobile trails and maintain their quality, thus supporting recreational activities in the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards SB136 appears to be generally positive among proponents who view the bill as a necessary administrative reform that will streamline funding for snowmobile trail maintenance. Advocates argue that the clearer rules will facilitate better planning and use of resources by local governments. Opposition might stem from concerns regarding the capping of funds, which could hinder smaller counties from effectively maintaining trails, potentially affecting their recreational offerings.

Contention

While SB136 has garnered support for its potential to enhance trail maintenance funding, some contention may arise regarding the limitations it imposes on aid amounts. Opponents could argue that setting a cap on supplemental aid may disproportionately affect less affluent counties that rely heavily on state support for maintaining their snowmobile trails. The balance between ensuring fiscal responsibility while adequately supporting local infrastructure is likely to be a key point of debate as the bill moves forward.