Wisconsin Senate Bill SB237

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/14/23
• Refer: 4/14/23
• Report Pass: 5/26/23
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Various changes to the unemployment insurance law and requiring approval by the Joint Committee on Finance of certain federally authorized unemployment benefits. (FE)

Impact

The bill mandates increased oversight by the Joint Committee on Finance, requiring that any proposed benefit augmentation associated with federal actions must obtain committee approval. This control is essential for authorizing any increases in the weekly UI benefit rate or overall entitlement amounts. The bill also emphasizes stricter requirements for claimants, such as mandated participation in work search activities and compliance verification with state job centers, thereby potentially increasing the scrutiny of claimants and their eligibility for UI benefits.

Summary

Senate Bill 237 proposes various amendments to the unemployment insurance (UI) law in Wisconsin. It seeks to redefine what constitutes misconduct for employees, which affects eligibility for UI benefits. Current laws provide a general definition of misconduct, including actions that lead to termination from employment. SB237 proposes to include new provisions that stipulate employee conduct as misconduct, such as violations of employer policies on absenteeism and tardiness, or unauthorized use of employer property or confidential information. By removing the necessity for the intent to deprive the employer of property, the bill broadens the scope of misconduct significantly.

Contention

Debate around this bill may arise from its implications on workers' rights and benefits. Supporters may argue that the changes will enhance the accountability of employees, ensuring a stronger link between conduct and benefits while making the unemployment system more sustainable. Conversely, opponents may express concerns about the potential for unfair penalties against employees, particularly those facing difficult personal circumstances that lead to absences or existing misunderstandings related to employer policies. The implications of this bill could incite significant discussion around worker protections and the state's role in regulating unemployment benefits.