Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00363

Introduced
1/26/21  
Refer
1/26/21  
Refer
1/26/21  
Report Pass
3/29/21  
Report Pass
3/29/21  
Refer
4/8/21  
Report Pass
4/14/21  
Report Pass
4/14/21  
Engrossed
6/4/21  
Report Pass
6/5/21  
Report Pass
6/5/21  
Passed
6/7/21  
Chaptered
6/23/21  
Chaptered
6/23/21  
Enrolled
6/24/21  
Enrolled
6/24/21  
Passed
7/7/21  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Authority Of The Office Of The Attorney General.

Impact

The enactment of SB 363 is expected to have a significant impact on state laws concerning civil rights protections. The Attorney General will now hold greater authority to intervene in cases of potential civil rights violations and has the capability to seek damages, including treble damages for the victims. This strengthens the legal framework for protecting individual rights and holds violators accountable, thereby enhancing the enforcement of justice at the state level. Additionally, civil penalties collected will be deposited in the General Fund, which could provide further resources for state functions.

Summary

Senate Bill 363, known as 'An Act Concerning The Authority Of The Office Of The Attorney General,' extends the investigatory powers of the Attorney General regarding violations of civil rights laws in the state. It allows the Attorney General to investigate alleged violations by issuing subpoenas and bringing civil actions if necessary. The bill is aimed at further protecting the rights of individuals and ensuring lawful governance through state authority. This legislation is designed to uphold both state and federal law pertaining to civil rights by empowering the Attorney General to act on behalf of the public when such laws are violated.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 363 is generally positive among those who advocate for civil rights and stronger state intervention to safeguard individual freedoms. Proponents view the bill as a necessary tool for enhancing the capacity of the Attorney General to respond effectively to civil rights infringements. However, there may be critics who fear that increased state power could lead to overreach or misuse of authority, particularly regarding how investigations are conducted and the potential implications for local governance.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding SB 363 is the balance between state authority and local autonomy. Some stakeholders express concern that while the bill aims to protect civil rights, it may infringe on local entities’ ability to manage their affairs regarding human rights issues. The provision that enables the Attorney General to intervene and bring actions on behalf of individuals may also raise questions about the scope and limits of state involvement in cases that could ordinarily be handled at a local level.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

IL SB2087

STATES ATTY-PEACE OFCR-PRIVACY

IL SB3671

STATES ATTY-PEACE OFCR-PRIVACY

CA SB605

State attorneys and administrative law judges: compensation.

CA AB1163

Minors: power of attorney to care for a minor child.

CA SB1109

Adoption.

CA SB710

District attorneys: conflicts of interest.

CA AB2083

Public utilities: rates.

CA AB894

Attorney General: directors and employees: exemption from civil service.