Louisiana House Bill HB573

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/31/17
• Refer: 3/31/17
• Refer: 4/10/17

Caption

Provides for participation in a dual enrollment program at postsecondary education institutions by certain high school students enrolled in programs approved by the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education

Impact

If enacted, HB 573 would substantially change the landscape of dual enrollment within the state, effectively increasing educational opportunities for a wider range of students. By removing previous restrictions on the use of state funds, the bill aims to ensure that funds are available for eligible students regardless of the type of high school they attend. This change is anticipated to promote greater educational equity across different socio-economic groups and facilitate smoother transitions to postsecondary education.

Summary

House Bill 573 seeks to broaden access to dual enrollment programs for high school students in Louisiana by allowing participation from students enrolled in various educational programs approved by the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education. This legislation notably includes students from nonpublic high schools and home study programs that are accredited by BESE, entitling them to state funding for their dual enrollment costs. The bill emphasizes the importance of residency, requiring that participating students be Louisiana residents.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 573 appears to be largely positive, particularly among education advocates and stakeholders who are in favor of expanding access to dual enrollment programs. Proponents argue that the bill recognizes and validates various educational pathways available to high school students, which could potentially enhance their academic and career prospects. However, there may be some dissent from factions concerned about the implications of increasing state financial commitments without sufficient oversight.

Contention

While many support the bill for its intention to democratize educational opportunities, some points of contention have emerged regarding the adequacy of funding and the state's capacity to manage an expanded dual enrollment program. Critics may raise concerns about the potential for increased costs to the state budget and whether the program's expansion might dilute the resources available for students enrolled in traditional public schools. Balancing expansion while ensuring quality and sustainability of the dual enrollment program will be crucial as discussions continue.