Missouri 2022 Regular Session

Missouri House Bill HB1667

Introduced
1/5/22  
Refer
1/6/22  
Report Pass
1/20/22  
Refer
1/20/22  
Report Pass
1/27/22  
Engrossed
2/23/22  
Refer
2/28/22  
Report Pass
4/20/22  
Refer
4/25/22  
Report Pass
5/6/22  
Enrolled
5/13/22  
Vetoed
7/1/22  

Caption

Creates new provisions relating to the sale of kratom products

Impact

The enactment of HB 1667 would have significant implications for state laws governing health and consumer protection. It preempts local governments from creating their own regulations on kratom, thus centralizing authority at the state level. This measure ensures that all sales of kratom products comply with standardized safety requirements, aiming to protect consumers from potentially harmful ingredients. The bill would also provide avenues for individuals harmed by violations to seek damages, which could bolster consumer rights and promote accountability among dealers.

Summary

House Bill 1667, also known as the Kratom Consumer Protection Act, is designed to implement regulatory measures concerning the sale and distribution of kratom products in Missouri. The bill aims to ensure consumer safety by establishing a framework that dealers must follow when selling kratom products. This includes requirements for clear labeling, disclosure of ingredients, and prohibitions against selling adulterated or contaminated products. Additionally, the bill seeks to restrict sales to individuals under the age of 18, thereby addressing concerns related to youth access and potential misuse.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1667 appears to be generally supportive among lawmakers concerned with consumer health and safety. Proponents of the bill argue that effective regulation is essential to mitigate risks associated with unregulated kratom products. However, critics may raise concerns about the preemption of local laws and the potential consequences for local businesses that rely on selling kratom. The bipartisan support during voting indicates a level of consensus, although debates may still exist regarding the balance between regulation and free market principles.

Contention

Some notable points of contention surrounding HB 1667 include the balance between state oversight and local autonomy. Opponents may argue that the one-size-fits-all approach could inadvertently hinder local governments from addressing unique community concerns regarding kratom. Additionally, discussions may arise regarding the adequacy of labeling and safety standards, alongside questions about enforcement and penalties for violations. These debates highlight the broader challenges of regulating emerging products in the marketplace while safeguarding public health.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.