Video & Transcript DataContr Research : 'property tax limitation'

Page 48 of 54
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • The two-hour limit was not waived for the committee hearing.
  • We could also limit the five minutes.
  • It is equally inappropriate for the Senate to impose new speech limits.
  • Because then you would give us another two-hour limit, and then it wouldn't happen.
  • ...limitation upon debate.
Bills: SB163, SB558
Summary: The committee meeting primarily focused on reviewing two significant bills: S558, the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act of 2025, and S163, the Protecting Students on Campus Act. Senator Tim Scott introduced S558, emphasizing its importance in combatting anti-Jewish violence and harassment, and providing the Department of Education with necessary tools to investigate incidents of anti-Semitism on college campuses. The bill sparked a vigorous debate among members who expressed concerns over potential implications for free speech, particularly regarding its definitions of anti-Semitism, and whether it would infringe upon First Amendment rights.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) Mar 20th, 2025

Senate State Affairs Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • the federal rule for Congressional testimony, which is limited
  • think that is the cleanest, clearest way to address this issue and make sure that we're going to the limits
  • The drawback, of course, is that in a limited set of circumstances, the two high courts might not agree
  • This bill would address the confusion by allowing, in limited circumstances where the Constitution is
  • You were limited by three minutes, I believe, or two

Summary: The meeting of the Senate Committee on State Affairs was marked by significant discussions surrounding several bills, primarily focusing on jurisdictional changes within the Texas Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals. One of the key bills discussed was SB1210, which aims to clarify the roles and jurisdictions of these two courts, ensuring that when constitutional interpretations are at issue, the Supreme Court serves as the final authority. Testimony was provided by various stakeholders including judges and legal experts, who articulated both support for and concerns about the potential implications of these changes. The conversation highlighted the historical context of the dual court system in Texas, outlining its benefits and drawbacks, particularly in ensuring consistency in the application of constitutional law.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 30th, 2025 at 08:04 am

House Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • And there's really no limit on where that is in the chain.
  • It ensures that access is limited to granted, expired, vacated, or active protective orders.
  • My expertise is fairly limited.
  • providing that filing suit in court tolls the limitations
  • But if you file a suit in a court, and it's to toll the limit, the statute.
Summary: The committee meeting convened to discuss several significant bills focusing on criminal justice and consumer protection. One of the highlights was Senate Bill 251, which aims to establish criminal law magistrates in Bell County to expedite proceedings for individuals in county jail. The bill received supportive commentary emphasizing its potential to ensure timely hearings and legal counsel, reflecting a commitment to swift justice. Additionally, House Bill 4713 was introduced, which aims to clarify the statute of limitations regarding arbitration proceedings, helping align the treatment of claims filed in court and in arbitration. This was discussed in light of ambiguous current practices that can impact fair resolution for claimants seeking timely justice. Public witnesses participated in evaluating both bills, although specifics on public testimony were limited as these bills were generally supported by members of the committee.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Public Health May 19th, 2025 at 10:05 am

House Public Health Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • For cosmetic purposes, it unnecessarily limits patients' access to safe, comprehensive care.
  • Let me ask you this: Can the dental board place limits on the amount of time a dentist devotes to their
  • Would you be opposed to limits?
  • Nothing in this bill limits it to that, right?

  • Is there anything in this bill that would limit you

Summary: During this meeting of the Committee on Public Health, members discussed several significant bills focused on expanding the scope of practice for dental professionals, specifically regarding the administration of neuromodulators such as Botox for aesthetic purposes. Senator Van Dever presented SB1117, which would allow licensed dentists to administer these treatments following proper training, a point that sparked a lively debate among committee members. While proponents emphasized the benefits of improving patient access to regulated aesthetic care, opponents raised concerns about the potential for dentists to prioritize cosmetic procedures over essential dental care, fearing that the marketplace could prioritize profit over patient safety. The bill enjoyed bipartisan support, having passed the Senate unanimously but faced scrutiny regarding the implications of allowing such expansion beyond traditional dental practices.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Aug 26th, 2025

Senate State Affairs Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • > So, I can't see the distinction between our efforts, which I think is very good public policy to limit
  • Call that's specific and limited that we can get in and out
  • Perhaps there could be a limit, through a constitutional amendment, on the time during which special
  • You knew you had a limited agenda.
  • Say it's time certain, limit the ability.
Bills: SB53, SB54, HB16, SB19
Summary: The Committee on State Affairs convened to discuss several significant bills, including SB19, SB54, HB16, and SB2217. A major focus was the potential changes to fundraising rules during special legislative sessions, aimed at aligning policies for regular and special sessions. Senator Bettencourt presented SB19, which prohibits political contributions during special sessions, raising questions about the implications for ongoing fundraising activities. Additionally, the committee reviewed SB54, which seeks to amend recent changes around voting procedures to prevent misunderstandings related to voter registration within counties. The session featured robust discussions, particularly surrounding the balance of regulations and the need for clear public policy. The meeting concluded with several bills moving forward positively, highlighting the collaborative effort among members.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Corrections May 5th, 2025 at 10:05 am

House Corrections Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • span>

    During the public testimony period, there will be a time limit

  • >All questions and remarks from the members or witnesses must be limited
  • ...limit the judiciary's responsibility for involvement in
  • With limited knowledge of CSCD operations and state requirements, current statute...
  • There's a limited number of spots.
Bills: SB663, SB958
Summary: During this committee meeting, significant discussions surrounded various bills including HB1969, SB958, and SB663. Representative Allen moved that HB1969 be reported favorably without amendments, which was adopted amidst a few dissenting votes concerning amendments on fees. The most notable conversation revolved around SB958, where Representative Thompson and other advocates passionately presented the case for trafficking survivors and the need to expand the list of sealable misdemeanors for these individuals. Witness testimonies reflected real-world implications, with survivors sharing their experiences to underscore the urgent need for legislative action.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 29th, 2025 at 08:04 am

House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • We are imposing a limit of two minutes on each witness

  • We're limited on time, so don't give us the...
  • Particularly in rural counties with limited facilities.
  • Article 507 does not abolish, expand, or limit the death penalty.
  • No, House Bill 507 does not abolish, expand, or limit the death penalty.
Summary: The meeting focused on several key pieces of legislation aiming to address legal representation issues, specifically regarding indigent defendants and the implications of artificial intelligence in legal matters. Notably, House Bill 3694, introduced by Representative Raymond, sought to regulate the use of AI in creating non-consensual explicit media, establishing stricter penalties. Additionally, House Bill 507, presented by Representative Gervin Hawkins, aimed to enhance the quality of legal representation for indigent defendants in capital cases by establishing stricter standards for appointed attorneys and promoting transparency in legal processes. Testimonies were heard for and against various bills, highlighting strong community engagement and varying opinions on these critical issues.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Health and Human ServicesAudio only. Apr 3rd, 2025

Senate Health & Human Services Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • marker="15" data-time="131">The committee substitute clarifies that the bill may not be construed to limit
  • committee substitute also includes provisions to order DFPS to pay for out-of-network services and limits
  • It limits the ability of foster parents to enroll a child

  • include changing "preborn" to "unborn" and "life-threatening disability" to "life-threatening or life-limiting
Summary: The meeting of the Senate committee was marked by the unanimous passage of multiple bills, including SB596, SB1151, and SB1318, which were all recommended for the local and uncontested calendar without any objections. The committee engaged in detailed discussions on SB855, where a committee substitute was presented to clarify court authority related to out-of-network services and establish parameters for foster parent enrollment in health plans. Additionally, the committee discussed SB1233, where changes were made to clarify medical terminologies and regulations pertaining to facilities providing care for life-threatening conditions.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • There will be a hard limit of two minutes per witness during the public testimony period.
  • However, consecutive sentencing is limited for cases involving
  • Its scope is therefore limited to the vehicles themselves.
  • unique vulnerability of passengers and operators in these often unpredictable confrontations, with limited
  • We've already made some notes there, and we're happy to limit it to law enforcement.
Summary: The committee meeting primarily focused on discussing various bills addressing public safety and criminal penalties within Texas. Notable discussions included the introduction of HB544, which aims to expand consecutive sentencing for crimes against children and vulnerable adults. Representative Gervin Hawkins highlighted the urgent need for this legislation by referencing a shocking case in Bexar County involving severe abuse, illustrating the limitations of current law in imposing adequate penalties. The bill received public support and raised awareness of the ongoing issues surrounding the safety of vulnerable populations.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Public Education May 6th, 2025 at 08:05 am

House Public Education Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • There will be a limit of two minutes per witness in testimony
  • Research is limited, but we know that the presence of gender dysphoria leads to a higher risk of suicide
  • In certain limited circumstances, they have, but they typically don't.
  • You have a two-minute limit. Less is more, but we do want to get through everyone.
  • Limiting education to a narrow-minded idea...

Summary: The committee meeting focused on the controversial HB1655, which aims to prohibit public school employees from facilitating or promoting the social transitioning of students. Testimonies for the bill emphasized parental rights and concerns about the mental wellbeing of children undergoing social transition without parental knowledge. Witnesses highlighted alarming cases, invoking examples of children being socially transitioned in schools that negate parental involvement, framing it as dangerous and deceptive. Conversely, opposition testimony raised concerns that the bill infringes upon the rights of transgender students to express their identities in supportive environments, highlighting the mental health implications for LGBTQ+ youth.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • begun to outweigh the cost of penalties, providing an economic incentive for violating pumping limitations
  • Limits are there for a reason, and if they choose to violate
  • Around the best science we have, to hopefully limit permitting
  • We’ve pumped either your TCEQ surface water right, or your groundwater conservation district permit limit
  • marker="193" data-time="1152"> ...DCPs, reduced drought contingency, or drought curtailment pumping limits
Summary: During this meeting, the committee had a thorough discussion centered around various Senate Bills primarily related to groundwater management and water utility regulations. Notably, Senate Bill 2661, introduced amendments to enhance penalties for over-pumping water, highlighting the growing concern over depleting aquifers and ensuring compliance with existing water use regulations. Multiple senators voiced their opinions regarding the necessity of tougher penalties and the implications for both water users and conservation methods. Public testimony was heard, with some arguing against the proposed penalties, stating they could unfairly burden farmers and landowners.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025

Senate Jurisprudence Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • span> A portion of this debt is owed by non-custodial parents with limited
  • such as dementia, Alzheimer's disease, stroke-related impairments, or other cognitive declines that limit
  • 238" data-time="1422"> Uh, that's why we're coming forward because currently, right now it's just limited
  • ...works best for them rather than being limited to attorneys
  • The bill will remove barriers that limit the ability of indigent parents to obtain high-quality legal
Summary: The meeting conducted by the Jurisprudence Committee featured significant discussions surrounding several bills focused on improving legal representation for indigent families and reforming the child support system in Texas. Notably, Senate Bill 2501 was presented to enhance access to legal counsel for families involved with the Child Protective Services, allowing them to choose their own attorneys. The bill was well-received with various testimonies supporting its potential positive impact on legal outcomes for families. Additionally, Senate Bill 629 aimed at reducing the interest rates on child support arrears was highlighted, with studies presented that indicated a decrease in non-custodial parents’ debt burden would lead to increased compliance in payments and better support for families.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.

State Affairs (Part II) Aug 4th, 2025

Senate State Affairs Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • For a police officer, an unsustained complaint can be kept indefinitely without a similar time limit.
  • of that report or is that off-limits?
  • I'm just looking for, I don't want the public to have limited access, but I don't want them...
  • , and I underline limited, access to these important records
  • The bill at a minimum will severely limit, and at worst, completely prevent people, including citizens
Bills: SB7, SB14
Summary: The meeting centered on a heated discussion regarding SB14, which proposed changes to how police misconduct records are managed and accessed. Numerous witnesses, including representatives from civil rights organizations and concerned citizens, expressed strong opposition to the bill, arguing that it would significantly reduce transparency and accountability within law enforcement agencies. Testimonies highlighted historical failures in police accountability and emphasized the importance of public access to misconduct records to restore community trust. The committee received both emotional appeals and expert opinions, painting a vivid picture of the potential negative impacts of the proposed legislation on police-community relations.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) May 1st, 2025

Senate State Affairs Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • On that, obviously right now the limit is seven, and with this bill, we go to nine, but we wanted to.
  • Therefore, that scope is limited based upon.
  • Typically, it's limited to periodic chart reviews or signed paperwork.
  • So APRN learning is limited to what they experience.
  • Like APRNs, sometimes they have a more limited scope of practice.
Summary: The Committee on State Affairs meeting featured in-depth discussions primarily centered around Senate Bills 2459 and 3055. SB 2459, presented by Senator Birdwell, aims to protect the personal information of judicial officials to reduce security risks associated with data brokers. This bill brought significant public testimony, with supporters highlighting the need for enhanced safety for judges and court personnel, given the increasing threats and incidents reported. The committee also considered amendments to further refine the bill's implementation process, ensuring the effective removal of personal data upon request. Senate Bill 3055 addressed the scope of practice for advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) in rural Texas, promoting greater healthcare access amidst ongoing shortages of providers. Advocates for the bill, including several nurse practitioners, voiced the necessity for legislative changes that would empower APRNs to practice more independently. Opposing testimony raised concerns regarding patient safety and the need for physician oversight. The meeting concluded with a commitment to review these bills further, reflecting the broader challenges of healthcare access and safety regulations in Texas.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th 2nd C.S.

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Aug 22nd, 2025 at 10:08 am

House Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • Public testimony will be limited to three minutes each.
  • It will affect how they parent their own children and will limit their life prospects.
  • And I would understand it that way, too, if the bill was limited to misconduct and didn't say including
  • That's not my read of it; the personnel file is incredibly limited.
  • But I want to limit my testimony to this.
Bills: SB15
Summary: The committee meeting centered around the discussion of SB15, which aims to standardize record-keeping protocols for law enforcement agencies across the state. It received a mixed reception from committee members and witnesses, with significant concern raised regarding its potential to obscure misconduct and limit public transparency. Public testimony included strong dissent from individuals and organizations advocating for greater accountability in policing, who argued that the bill could enable law enforcement agencies to suppress critical information under the guise of confidentiality. Significant dialogue pertained to the implications of the bill in light of recent events that highlighted the need for transparency in police conduct, particularly in controversial cases such as the Uvalde school shooting. Ultimately, the bill was passed out of committee with minimal opposition.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Criminal Justice (Part II) Feb 12th, 2025

Senate Criminal Justice Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • Speaking to the microphone, public testimony will be limited to two minutes on each bill and subject
  • our society, liberty is the norm, and detention prior to trial or without trial is the carefully limited
  • Pretrial detention in Texas is not carefully limited;

  • Because as drafted, it is missing critical procedural safeguards to carefully limit pretrial detention
Summary: The Senate Committee for Criminal Justice convened to discuss several significant pieces of legislation, including SB999, SB1047, SB40, SJR1, and SJR5. Notably, SJR5 sparked a robust debate among committee members and witnesses regarding its potential implications on pre-trial detention practices. Witnesses expressed concerns about the risks of pre-emptive detention outlined in the bill and the associated human costs, particularly for those who are innocent. Testimonies highlighted the disparity in how such legislation could disproportionately affect marginalized communities and lead to increased incarceration rates without addressing the root causes of crime. Overall, the committee displayed a commitment to ensuring public safety while wrestling with the balance of due process rights for individuals.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Mar 25th, 2025 at 02:03 pm

House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • I would just point out that, you know, we're limited to the
  • I'm not sure we can take care of everything with this bill because we're limited to the scope and germaneness
  • that other bill, which I can't remember the number of, where it was better to say including but not limited
  • If one of those two offenses is against a person of any age, as opposed to limiting it to against a child
  • Under some limited circumstances or not?
Summary: The committee meeting focused on a range of bills addressing important topics such as artificial intelligence and sexual exploitation laws. Notably, House Bill 235, which aims to add civil and criminal liability for the use of AI-generated deepfake materials, garnered discussion from multiple members and witnesses, including Adrian Shelley from Public Citizen who expressed support for the bill. Concerns about ensuring the legislation's clarity and enforcement were raised. Additionally, House Bill 207 was presented, which seeks to expand definitions within sexual offense laws to include representations involving anatomically correct dolls, eliciting varied perspectives from representatives during the debate.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 19th, 2025 at 08:00 am

House Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • For hearing House Bill 865, this is a bill that limits civil
  • Okay, and we're going to limit witness testimony today to...
  • Time limit doesn't apply to this bill. Thank you.
  • When I was abused in 2005, the statute of limitations

  • It took over four decades for me to work around NDAs and statutes of limitations to even have a chance
Summary: The committee meeting centered around the discussions of three key bills: HB865, HB1928, and HB748. Notably, HB865, presented by Speaker Moody, received significant attention as it aims to clarify liability protections for federal firearms licensees, emphasizing its importance for supporting veterans' mental health and safety. Testimonies were provided by various stakeholders, including city council members and law enforcement representatives, who underscored the pressing need for legislative support in the wake of alarming suicide rates among veterans. The committee engaged in comprehensive discussions, highlighting the bill’s potential impact on improving public safety and mental health support within the veteran community. Throughout the session, the committee showed commitment to addressing issues within the statutory probate court system as well, referring HB1928 directly to a relevant subcommittee for further evaluation. The meeting concluded with a strong emphasis on collaboration among committee members and public input, setting the stage for further review and action on these significant legislative proposals. Overall, the meeting was efficient and well-attended, with active participation from both committee members and the public.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence May 6th, 2025 at 08:05 am

House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • well, to accommodate the witnesses and the time that we have allotted today, we placed a two-minute limit
  • I hear the fiscal note's only $42,000, and it's limited to $3,000 per tattoo removal, so that's up to
  • marker="238" data-time="1422">Well, I think that in our reading of it, it's probably going to be a limited
  • However, there are limited exceptions where evidence may be admitted if it meets strict criteria.
  • this is a clean-up where the Texas Human Trafficking Omnibus Bill from last session raised the age limit
Summary: The meeting convened to discuss various bills primarily focused on juvenile justice and legal representation standards. Notable discussions included House Bill 437, which addresses the placement of youth in detention facilities according to regulations, as explained by Representative Cook. House Bill 507, which pertains to legal representation for indigent defendants, also sparked a debate that resulted in tight voting, showcasing the divergent opinions among committee members. Additionally, Senate Bill 40 underwent a reconsideration, reflecting substantial amendments aimed at balancing non-profit and for-profit entity payments related to bail bonds, which highlighted the complexities of legislative amendments and the procedural adherence required to maintain order in discussions.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

S/C on Juvenile Justice Apr 14th, 2025 at 08:04 am

House S/C on Juvenile Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • data-time="36">Please be respectful of others that are testifying with regard to the three-minute time limit
  • span> Finally, per House Procedure rules, witness testimony must be limited
  • Currently, access to information in juvenile cases is limited to the prosecutor, the child's parents,
  • House Bill 4923 also wisely limits the detention of status offenders.
Summary: The meeting was focused on several critical bills concerning juvenile justice in Texas, with particular emphasis on reforms to improve support for young individuals in the juvenile justice system. Notable discussions included House Bill 3882, presented by Dr. Lalani, which aims to expand eligibility for job training grants to youth in juvenile justice facilities, enhancing their opportunities for successful reintegration into society. Witnesses testifying in support illustrated the transformative impact of educational programs on at-risk youth. Additionally, House Bill 4923 was highlighted, with Speaker Moody advocating for a shift away from punitive measures against status offenders, emphasizing the importance of addressing root causes rather than criminalizing conduct associated with running away from home. The meeting included participation from various stakeholders, including local officials and advocates for juvenile justice reform, who underscored the urgent need for these legislative changes. The committee's deliberations showcased a strong commitment to fostering a rehabilitative rather than punitive approach to juvenile justice, reflecting broader national trends and best practices in the field. Many members expressed support for the bills discussed, recognizing their potential to positively impact youth outcomes and community safety. The atmosphere was collaborative, with members actively engaging in discussions about amendments and potential adjustments to strengthen the proposed legislation. As the session wrapped up, several bills moved closer to the full committee for consideration.

Research Filters

States
Terms / Sessions
Date Range
Chamber Records
Meetings / Events / Calendars