Texas House Bill HB3637

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/21/09
• Voted on by House: 5/6/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/20/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/26/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 6/1/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to filing fees in civil actions and proceedings and the use of those fees, to costs on conviction in certain courts, to money paid into the registry of a court in certain counties, and to the appointment of counsel in certain suits.

Impact

The bill introduces notable changes to how counties may collect and allocate court fees, applying specifically to counties with populations exceeding certain thresholds. It enables county and district courts to establish technology funds aimed at improving electronic management and access to court records. Moreover, the requirement for counties to appoint counsel in eviction cases under specific circumstances represents a significant shift toward ensuring legal representation for parties in vulnerable positions. This could empower defendants in eviction proceedings by providing them access to legal advice they might not otherwise afford.

Summary

House Bill 3637 addresses changes to filing fees in civil actions and proceedings in Texas, particularly in relation to the appointment of counsel in eviction suits and the use of collected fees. A key provision of the bill is the establishment of a technology fee of $4 for defendants convicted in county courts, which will be directed towards enhancing technological capabilities in court operations. Additionally, the bill mandates the collection of various fees upon filing civil actions, including an additional $10 charge that specifically funds legal services for indigent individuals and a $42 fee dedicated to supporting the judiciary in civil cases.

Contention

Debate surrounding HB 3637 likely revolved around the implications of increased filing fees, particularly for low-income individuals seeking legal recourse. Supporters may argue that the technological investments and support for legal services are necessary to modernize the court system and enhance access to justice, whereas critics could express concerns over the potential financial burdens these changes place on the average citizen attempting to navigate the civil courts. Furthermore, the balance of responsibilities between local courts and the state might be a point of contention, especially regarding the funding and applicability of legal services for the indigent.