Us Congress Senate Bill SJR30

Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/3/25
• Refer: 3/3/25

Caption

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Park Service relating to "Glen Canyon National Recreation Area; Motor Vehicles".

Impact

The resolution's impact could potentially lead to changes in how vehicle regulations are managed in the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. By disapproving the existing rule, Congress could allow for a more flexible regulatory approach concerning motor vehicles, depending on the subsequent decisions made by legislators or the National Park Service. This could affect visitor access and the management of natural resources in the area, reflecting larger tensions between regulatory oversight and resource management.

Summary

SJR30 is a joint resolution introduced in the U.S. Senate that aims to provide congressional disapproval of a rule submitted by the National Park Service pertaining to motor vehicle regulations in the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. The resolution effectively nullifies the rule that was published in the Federal Register, and states that such a rule shall have no force or effect. This bill highlights the legislative aim to exert congressional control over specific regulatory actions taken by federal agencies regarding public lands.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SJR30 appears to be mixed, with support from those who advocate for greater flexibility in managing national parks and detractors who may be concerned about the environmental implications of loosening regulations. Stakeholders in the outdoor recreation and conservation communities might express differing views on the balance between access and preservation in the Glen Canyon area. Legislators' positions could vary widely, reflecting broader partisan divides on environmental issues.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the appropriateness of congressional intervention in the operations of the National Park Service. Critics of SJR30 might argue that allowing Congress to disapprove of agency rules undermines the expertise of land management professionals and could lead to inconsistent regulations based on political interests rather than scientific data. Additionally, discussions about the environmental impacts of increased motor vehicle access in sensitive areas could become points of debate, highlighting the challenges in balancing recreational access with environmental stewardship.

Congress_id

119-SJRES-30

Introduced_date

2025-03-03