Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB1119

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/23/24
• Refer: 2/23/24
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Creating an exemption to certain requirements for rules promulgated by the Department of Natural Resources relating to groundwater protection standards for PFAS.

Impact

The implementation of AB1119 would have notable implications on state laws concerning environmental protection and public health. By removing the financial barriers associated with establishing these crucial regulations, the bill is intended to facilitate quicker action on addressing contamination issues associated with PFAS in groundwater. Supporters of the bill argue that it is essential to ensure timely protective measures are in place to safeguard public health and environmental standards against the risks posed by these hazardous substances.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1119 proposes an amendment to existing regulations concerning groundwater protection standards specifically concerning perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The bill seeks to create an exemption for the Department of Natural Resources from the current requirement that mandates suspension of permanent rule-making if the projected implementation and compliance costs exceed $10 million over a two-year period. By introducing this exemption, the bill aims to enable the Department to establish necessary groundwater protection regulations without facing significant financial constraints that might delay or prevent such regulations from being enacted.

Contention

Despite its intended benefits, AB1119 may face contention from various stakeholders who are concerned about the lack of checks imposed by the suspended cost threshold. Critics argue that this exemption could lead to potentially unfettered regulatory processes that might overlook critical economic considerations or the fiscal impact of such regulations on businesses and communities. Advocates for stricter environmental regulatory measures generally support the bill but highlight the need for careful consideration of compliance costs and local economic contexts.