Transcript Highlights:

• of business on the committee substitute for Senate Bill 1816.
• On second reading, committee substitute for Senate Bill 1939.
• The chair lays out on third reading and final passage: Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 1738.
• West, you're recognized on Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 578.

• Senate Committee on Nominations Action Report.

Bills: SJR12, SCR39, SB7, SB8, SB27, SB29, SB125, SB241, SB371, SB396, SB406, SB464, SB568, SB578, SB608, SB617, SB660, SB689, SB693, SB707, SB731, SB732, SB763, SB779, SB836, SB854, SB857, SB875, SB878, SB879, SB906, SB920, SB921, SB922, SB942, SB965, SB985, SB996, SB1029, SB1035, SB1036, SB1059, SB1084, SB1098, SB1101, SB1185, SB1188, SB1321, SB1332, SB1366, SB1388, SB1396, SB1453, SB1484, SB1494, SB1536, SB1563, SB1596, SB1610, SB1619, SB1737, SB1738, SB1741, SB1816, SB1822, SB1841, SB1939, SB2155, SB2188, SB2230, SJR36, SJR12, SJR81, SJR50, SCR22, SCR12, SCR39, SB765, SB62, SB666, SB888, SB687, SB847, SB1248, SB504, SB857, SB305, SB296, SB284, SB241, SB304, SB1023, SB204, SB609, SB670, SB850, SB854, SB413, SB1346, SB1033, SB1220, SB1073, SB810, SB1539, SB447, SB406, SB985, SB1119, SB1505, SB1215, SB1302, SB583, SB673, SB681, SB1172, SB608, SB955, SB957, SB1120, SB541, SB1737, SB266, SB1415, SB125, SB53, SB1352, SB785, SB1450, SB1502, SB1566, SB414, SB1062, SB578, SB711, SB746, SB942, SB1404, SB1448, SB1738, SB507, SB689, SB1026, SB1349, SB1355, SB1433, SB1434, SB1596, SB1403, SB763, SB667, SB1059, SB617, SB1567, SB310, SB311, SB505, SB1209, SB1210, SB1470, SB264, SB1029, SB1358, SB1364, SB1569, SB1376, SB1228, SB519, SB878, SB1350, SB462, SB827, SB1585, SB1396, SB920, SB1484, SB1273, SB1741, SB7, SB927, SB1227, SB1229, SB1353, SB1366, SB1464, SB1709, SB1729, SB1733, SB1744, SB1772, SB1816, SB1841, SB2188, SB1147, SB879, SB1008, SB1536, SB2016, SB1453, SB1173, SB1163, SB996, SB27, SB568, SB1370, SB1321, SB1101, SB906, SB860, SB1563, SB993, SB693, SB1610, SB1537, SB836, SB1332, SB1307, SB963, SB493, SB922, SB984, SB1084, SB619, SB1098, SB1122, SB455, SB522, SB1057, SB1239, SB1254, SB1255, SB1259, SB1341, SB1664, SB1877, SB464, SB1277, SB32, SB732, SB660, SB731, SB921, SB268, SB1822, SB1188, SB1939, SB1589, SB397, SB1388, SB2230, SB1058, SB1036, SB1267, SB2112, SB1930, SB532, SB1035, SB2155, SB508, SB29, SB292, SB291, SB901, SB1333, SB1436, SB1494, SB964, SB779, SB1378, SB2312, SB1719, SB1386, SB287, SB2143, SB1245, SB261, SB1247, SB1948, SB2406, SB2407, SB1882, SB1197, SB1814, SB618, SB38, SB393, SB2065, SB1371, SB1394, SB1365, SB2243, SB2226, SB2039, SB1919, SB1895, SB1598, SB1493, SB1810, SB1791, SB1706, SB1644, SB1238, SB783, SB458, SB22, SB651, SB897, SB7, SB125, SB578, SB608, SB617, SB763, SB836, SB878, SB906, SB920, SB942, SB985, SB1084, SB1366, SB1388, SB1563, SB1737, SB1738, SB1816, SB1939, SB406, SB689, SR327, SR346, SR351, SR352

Keywords: parental rights, education, constitutional amendment, school choice, child education, water infrastructure, financial assistance, Texas Water Development Board, water supply, environmental sustainability, immigration enforcement, ICE agreements, sheriff grants, law enforcement, county jail, federal immigration law, business organization, internal management, corporate governance, partnerships

Summary: The meeting was marked by significant discussions around key legislative bills, primarily focusing on the implications of HB22, which was introduced by Senator Flinstone. The bill received both support and opposition from various committee members and witnesses. Notably, concerns raised involved the potential impacts of the legislation on local communities and resources. Members engaged in a spirited debate, with several stakeholders providing testimonials highlighting their perspectives on the bill's repercussions. Additionally, the committee took the opportunity to address other minor bills, although they did not receive as much attention.

Transcript Highlights:

• Senator Hughes sends up the committee substitute; the chair lays out the committee substitute for Senate
• on Senate Bill 25.
• Wilkinson, I have one quick question on Senate Bill 731. Is that prospective only on the bill?
• Committee on Health and Human Services.
• The Senate Committee on Health and Human Services will reconvene

Keywords: healthcare reform, pharmacy benefit managers, consumer protection, community-based care, child welfare, Senate Bill 513, House Bill 1919, House Bill 1763

Summary: The meeting involved in-depth discussions focused primarily on several significant bills aimed at reforming healthcare, improving consumer protection, and enhancing community-based care. Key highlights included House Bill 1919 and House Bill 1763, which address the roles and regulation of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) in Texas. Lawmakers emphasized the need for these bills to create a fairer landscape for independent pharmacies while ensuring patient access to necessary medications. Public testimonies reflected both support for the reforms and concerns regarding their potential implications. Another major topic was Senate Bill 513, which proposes the development of a pilot program for community-based care in rural West Texas, aiming to improve child welfare services in regions facing unique challenges.

Transcript Highlights:

• The Senate Water Committee on Agriculture, Water, and Rural Affairs

• Tonight, the Chair recognizes Senator Hinojosa on Senate Bill
• The committee substitute for Senate Bill 3058 is on the table.
• As the Senate Sponsor, Chairman Perry is on the bill. There is a committee substitute.
• Chairman Perry is recognized on the committee. Senator Kochoris.

Keywords: groundwater conservation, water resources management, House Bill 1633, House Bill 1689, Senate Bill 3058, public testimony, pipeline construction fees, export fees

Summary: The meeting of the committee addressed significant issues surrounding groundwater conservation, with a focus on several proposed bills aimed to enhance the management and sustainability of water resources in the region. House Bill 1633 was discussed, which seeks to strengthen criteria used by groundwater conservation districts (GCDs) when permitting, ensuring that they factor in potential impacts on neighboring exempt wells. Positive sentiments were expressed regarding the need for more stringent evaluations of groundwater permits to preserve resources effectively. This bill aims to reinforce accountability among GCDs, emphasizing the criticality of groundwater, especially in rural areas where access is essential for agricultural and domestic use. In addition, House Bill 1689 and Senate Bill 3058 were presented, both aimed at improving how GCDs utilize export fees and manage water conservation measures. Public testimony highlighted the concerns of landowners about excessive pipeline construction fees and a lack of adequate authority to collaborate with counties on water projects. The committee adopted several amendments to these bills to better align the interests of landowners with water conservation goals. The meeting concluded with an acknowledgment of the pressing need to balance development and conservation, signaling a collective intent to move forward with actionable legislation.

Transcript Highlights:

• This is bill number one on the Senate floor for this session.
• I appreciate you working on this in committee with us, Senator Paxton, and making sure those clarifications
• I'll keep working on you, Senator Alvarado.
• Senator Creighton on the amendment.
• Senator King, you're recognized on the amendment.

Bills: SB2, SJR36, SB2, SB2, SR29, SB2

Keywords: Maverick County, recognition, economic development, Texas Senate, community celebration, education savings accounts, SB2, transparency, accountability, amendments, special education, public funds, student discrimination

Summary: The meeting focused extensively on the amendments and discussions pertaining to SB2, which is aimed at establishing an education savings account program. Various members presented and debated amendments that targeted transparency, accountability, and potential conflicts of interest within the private education sector. Notably, Senator Cook proposed an amendment to require educational service providers to make their budgets public, while Senator Blanco highlighted the need for disclosures relevant to parents of special education and English language learners. The bill saw intense discussion around protecting taxpayer dollars and ensuring that the provisions did not segregate or discriminate against students within the program. Throughout the meeting, the committee demonstrated robust engagement with both proponents and opponents of the bill, examining the implications of the proposed amendments critically. The overall atmosphere suggested a strong desire to balance educational freedom with accountability and oversight. The meeting concluded with calls for diligence in ensuring that public funds are appropriately utilized, setting the stage for future discussions as the bill proceeds through the legislative process.

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair, Vice Chair Charles Perry, Senator Bob Hall, Senator Angela Paxton, and Senator Mayes Middleton
• On behalf of AARP Texas and our 2.5 million members across the state, we are here to support Senate Bill
• and we thank Senator Blanco for his leadership on this important bill.
• 40 organizations who support Senate Bill 911 for one simple reason.
• We thank Senator Blanco for his leadership on this important bill.

Bills: SB2, SJR36, SB2, SB2, SR29, SB2

Keywords: Maverick County, recognition, economic development, Texas Senate, community celebration, SB911, Heal Texans Act, healthcare access, nurse practitioners, health crisis, rural healthcare, Texas legislature

Summary: The committee meeting centered around the discussion of SB911, the Heal Texans Act, aimed at improving access to healthcare in underserved areas of Texas. Senator Cesar Blanco opened the discussion by highlighting the healthcare crisis affecting millions of Texans, emphasizing the need for immediate reform to allow nurse practitioners (APRNs) to deliver essential services without cumbersome regulations. The senator expressed gratitude towards his colleagues, including Vice Chair Charles Perry, for their joint efforts in advocating for this critical legislation. The need for SB911 was reiterated by several speakers, including healthcare advocates and those impacted by the lack of accessible care, underscoring personal stories that illustrated the dire situation faced by many rural residents who cannot easily reach medical care.

Transcript Highlights:

• ...close on Senate Bill 1277.
• Seeing none, the chair recognizes Chair Button to close on Senate Bill 2521.
• Seeing none, the chair recognizes Chair Izquierdo to close on Senate Bill 1531.
• Seeing none, the chair recognizes Chair Pursuit to close on Senate Bill 2541.
• The chair recognizes Vice Chair Noble to close on Senate Bill 2520.

Bills: SB1277, SB1531, SB2452, SB2520, SB2521, SB2529, SB2538, SB2539, SB2541, SB2873

Keywords: ad valorem tax, elderly, disabled, homestead exemption, school district, Senate Bill 1277, Coppell, municipal street maintenance tax, infrastructure projects, tax stabilization, public testimony

Summary: The meeting primarily focused on a series of Senate Bill presentations, particularly highlighting SB1277 which aims to extend the reauthorization period for the municipal street maintenance (SMR) tax in the city of Coppell from four years to ten years. This extension aims to stabilize funding for vital infrastructure projects, helping the city avoid potential financial disruptions and additional tax burdens on residents. Testimonies included insights from public representatives, including Mayor Pro Tem Don Carroll, who emphasized the bill's importance for ongoing maintenance efforts and taxpayer savings.

Transcript Highlights:

• ...do pass, be printed, and be sent to the Committee on Local
• on Calendars.
• ...printed and be sent to the Committee on Calendars.

• Again, this is something this committee and the Senate

• ...penalty on one person, one time. Thank you.

Bills: HB4530, HB4931, HB5559, HB5560

Keywords: water rights, Texas Water Trust, water bank, environmental conservation, water quality, instream flows, aquifer, water injection, Edwards Aquifer, environmental regulation, groundwater, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, water conservation, drought, utility regulation, water use restrictions, Public Utility Commission, groundwater, civil penalties, water conservation

Summary: The meeting of the committee involved extensive discussions on multiple bills related to water management and resources in Texas, particularly emphasizing the importance of legislative measures to enhance the conservation and management of groundwater resources. Representative Romero laid out HB4530, which aims to expand the Texas Water Trust to include groundwater rights, enabling voluntary dedication for conservation and addressing the regulatory gaps that currently exist. The bill received support as it seeks to clarify the processes for groundwater donations, thus promoting effective water management strategies across the state.

Transcript Highlights:

• President, I move to concur on House amendments to Senate Bill 3.
• Senator Bettencourt moves that the Senate concur on House
• Thank you, Senator, and thank you for the work on the bill.
• I move to suspend the 24-hour posting rules, Rule 709 and Rule 1119, so that the Senate Committee on
• Rules 11.10 and 11.18 so that the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services can hear the following

Bills: SB3, SB16, SB2, SB5, SB10, HB17, SB54, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB8, HB25, HB26, HB192

Keywords: real property theft, real property fraud, criminal offenses, restitution, elderly protection, disabled individuals, property tax exemption, title fraud, recording requirements, real property theft, real property fraud, criminal offenses, elderly protection, disability rights, recording requirements, restitution, disaster relief, emergency preparedness, flood management, local government grants

Summary: The meeting featured crucial discussions surrounding several bills, notably Senate Bill 3, which focuses on establishing effective flood warning systems in Texas. Senator Betancourt introduced the bill, emphasizing its potential to save lives, especially in flood-prone areas. The legislation aims to identify high-risk locations, install outdoor warning systems, and provide necessary funding for implementation. Senator Hinojosa also discussed Senate Bill 16 Regarding real property fraud, which involves amendments requested by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The discussions reflected the urgency for these measures in light of recent events and highlighted collaborative efforts among legislators.

Transcript Highlights:

• The Senate Committee on Local Government will come to order.

• > Joint Resolution 85, both by Senator Bettencourt, and I will ask Senator
• Then we'll open it up for public testimony on both Senate Bill 23 as well as the H.
• In 1979, Senator Grant Jones passed Senate Bill 621, which changed the entire property tax system.
• day, one of you will believe me.

Bills: SB23, SJR85

Keywords: homestead exemption, elderly, disabled, ad valorem taxation, school district funding, property tax, homestead exemption, senior tax relief, disabled taxpayer, Senate Bill 23, Joint Resolution 85

Summary: The meeting of the Senate Committee focused on significant property tax legislation, predominantly revolving around SB23 and HJR85, both introduced by Senator Bettencourt. These proposals aim to enhance the homestead exemption for senior and disabled taxpayers, raising it from $10,000 to $60,000. Senator Bettencourt expressed enthusiasm about the potential impact of these bills, which he emphasized as the most significant tax relief measure for seniors in Texas in decades. The discussion included estimated savings of $950 per qualifying homeowner, which drew positive remarks from committee members regarding the importance of making property taxes more manageable for vulnerable populations.

Transcript Highlights:

• Members of the committee, this is Senate Bill 2199 by Birdwell

• that's going on.
• this one.
• I respectfully ask that Senate Bill 25A 9B be reported. All in favor of the committee, thank you.
• Senate Bill 2245 will be left pending at this time. The committee needs to recess for the day.

Bills: SB35, SB1113, SB1365, SB1394, SB2243, SB2245, SB2589, SB2199, SB2200

Keywords: county roads, abandonment, public nuisance, safety hazard, transportation, transportation, design-build contracts, Senate Bill 35, public safety, infrastructure, Texas Department of Transportation, Texas Trucking Association

Summary: The committee meeting focused on various legislative proposals, particularly those related to transportation and public safety. A significant point of discussion was Senate Bill 35, which seeks to limit the Texas Department of Transportation's ability to utilize design-build contracts for infrastructure projects. Advocates for the bill expressed concerns over financial implications and the efficiency of project delivery, while opponents emphasized the need for flexibility and innovation in addressing Texas's growing infrastructure needs. Several stakeholders, including the Texas Trucking Association, engaged in debates over the impacts of the proposed limitations.

Transcript Highlights:

• The Senate will come to order.

• Chair: Thank you, Senator Birdwell.
• and reference to the committee.

• Senate Bill One by Huffman, the General Appropriations

• Senate Bill One by Huffman, the General Appropriations

Bills: SJR36, SB1, SJR36, SB1

Keywords: appropriations, budget, state funding, education, healthcare, infrastructure, appropriations, budget, state funding, education, healthcare, infrastructure, Senate, SJR36, SB1, constitutional amendment, historical preservation, appropriations, weather impact, legislative session

Summary: This meeting of the Senate included the introduction and discussion of several key legislative items, notably SJR36, which proposes a constitutional amendment pertaining to the preservation of historical items, and SB1, the general appropriations act for financing. The session was notably affected by inclement weather, as members were advised about travel conditions and attendance was impacted as a result. There were specific discussions led by Senator Hall regarding the significance of the proposed amendment, with emphasis on the importance of historical conservation in the state.

Transcript Highlights:

• Point and Senate Bill 7 and the committee substitute really
• I really want to thank the committee and Chairman Harris for that leadership on expanding that list.
• Jeremy with Texas 2036, here today in support of the committee substitute for Senate Bill 7.
• It requires that the board report to the committee on the state's progress and achievement towards expanding
• Thank you for Senator Perry's leadership on this as well.

Bills: SB7

Keywords: water infrastructure, financial assistance, Texas Water Development Board, water supply, environmental sustainability, Senate Bill 7, water infrastructure, testimony, flood infrastructure, water reuse, legislative oversight, environmental sustainability

Summary: The committee meeting primarily focused on Senate Bill 7, which aims to enhance Texas's water infrastructure amid growing population and environmental challenges. Various stakeholders, including representatives from engineering firms, environmental organizations, and water associations, testified in support of the bill, emphasizing its potential to address pressing water supply issues and improve infrastructure reliability. Key topics of discussion included water reuse, flood infrastructure funding, and the need for legislative oversight to ensure effective management of financial resources. The testimony underscored the importance of adapting to aging water systems while promoting innovative solutions for sustainability.

Transcript Highlights:

• Okay, the Senate Committee on Education, K-16, will come to order.

• First of all, let the record show that Senator Mays Middleton was the one who sent the committee substitute
• Good afternoon, esteemed members of the Senate Committee on Education.
• On for or against the committee substitute bill, Senate Bill
• , and upon a motion by Senator Parker, the Senate Committee on Education, K-16, will stand in recess.

Bills: SB26

Keywords: teacher compensation, education funding, public school educators, teacher retention, teacher designation, Senate Bill 26, teacher compensation, education, salary increase, Texas teachers, teacher retention, educational reform, public testimony

Summary: The meeting of the Senate Committee on Education featured an extensive discussion on Senate Bill 26, aimed at reforming teacher compensation in Texas. Notable highlights included testimonies emphasizing the urgent need for meaningful salary increases for teachers across the state. Members discussed the historical nature of the proposed pay raises, which would establish a permanent salary allotment for teachers, allowing for dispatches of nearly $5 billion aimed at boosting educator retention. The importance of addressing teacher safety and equality across various educational roles was also a significant point of focus during this meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• and on?
• Just have one question: is this, so Senate Bill 929 passed

• Hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on.

• So a small city, and we've had several come testify before this committee on other bills, would not even
• Chairman Gates, Vice Chairman Lalani, and members of the House Committee on Labor.

Bills: HB24, HB2015, HB2149, HB2559, HB2701, HB2797, HB3172

Keywords: zoning, public notice, local government, residential development, protests, water conservation, municipal utility districts, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, environmental regulation, groundwater management, nonconforming uses, zoning regulations, land use, property rights, municipal authority, recreational vehicle parks, campgrounds, construction standards, safety regulations, fire protection

Summary: The meeting addressed significant bills with a focus on housing and property rights, specifically discussing HB2149 and HB2559. Representative Tepper introduced HB2149, which aims to amend amortization and non-conforming land-use procedures to better protect private property rights. The bill received testimony supporting its intent to maintain a balance between property development and municipal zoning regulations. Furthermore, Representative Patterson discussed HB2559, emphasizing the need for establishing reasonable protections against development moratoriums that affect homeowners and builders, highlighting the necessity for adequate notice and a higher threshold for moratorium approvals. Both discussions prompted vigorous dialogue and engagement among committee members as well as the public, illustrating the complexities involved in balancing growth and regulation in real estate development.

Transcript Highlights:

• If other language is adopted on the Senate floor, we will consider an updated committee substitute.
• We welcome the opportunity to work with you and the committee on this bill.
• Thanks again to the committee for considering another one of these housing bills.
• Hearing none, the chair moves to adjourn the Committee on Land and Resource Management.
• The heavily modified version of the original bill heard by the Senate Committee on Local Government may

Bills: HB24, HB2015, HB2149, HB2559, HB2701, HB2797, HB3172

Keywords: zoning, public notice, local government, residential development, protests, water conservation, municipal utility districts, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, environmental regulation, groundwater management, nonconforming uses, zoning regulations, land use, property rights, municipal authority, recreational vehicle parks, campgrounds, construction standards, safety regulations, fire protection

Summary: The meeting centered around discussions on land use and zoning regulations, prominently featuring HB24 and HB3172. Representative Orr emphasized the importance of reforming the existing zoning laws to empower property owners and streamlined processes for development. Testimonies from various stakeholders highlighted the impact of the current supermajority requirements which hinder necessary housing projects, creating frustration among local developers and advocates for affordable housing. Notable support was expressed for these bills, highlighting the necessity for cities to modernize their zoning systems to facilitate growth and adequate housing development.

Transcript Highlights:

• Go ahead and close on the bill.
• I can't put a price tag on it, so I think it's not a fair example, but it's a good one.
• The TCEQ data shows one.
• One thing that I think is confusing and that this committee gets to deal with is...
• Any of you that would like to go deeper into this, I'd be glad to meet with you one-on-one, and I would

Bills: HB23, HB363, HB447, HB954

Keywords: third-party review, property development, local government, permits, construction inspection, regulatory authority, land development, liability, occupancy certificate, municipal utility district, petition, county clerk, water code, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, traffic impact studies, municipal utility district, bonds, road projects, eminent domain, extraterritorial jurisdiction

Summary: The meeting was convened by Chairman Gates, focusing primarily on discussions of several key bills including HB363, HB954, and others pertaining to municipal utility districts (MUDs). Notably, a public testimony highlighted the need for comprehensive reform in the MUD process, emphasizing the importance of pre-petition notices to counties to ensure transparency and effective community involvement. The committee members engaged in a dialogue about the necessity of legislative measures to improve notification processes, public safety, and county jurisdiction in these developments. Representative Bell presented HB363, detailing the need for timely notifications to affected parties, which was heavily supported during the discussions.

Transcript Highlights:

• Am I on for or against Senate Bill 810?
• Please vote no on Senate Bill 3.
• My name is Andrea Salas-Daniels, and I testify before the Texas Senate Committee on behalf of the Texas
• This evening for the Senate Committee on State Affairs.

• With that, the Senate Committee on State Affairs

Bills: SB3, SB810, SB965, SB1073, SB1119, SB1505

Keywords: water parks, liability, safety regulations, recreational activities, injury waivers, THC regulation, public safety, Senate Bill 3, Texas Compassionate Use Program, bipartisan support, public testimony, cannabis legislation, economic impact

Summary: The meeting of the Senate State Affairs Committee provided a platform for discussing a comprehensive agenda featuring multiple bills, particularly focusing on concerns surrounding THC regulations and its implications for public safety. Notably, Senate Bill 3, which seeks to ban consumable hemp products containing THC, drew strong public testimony from various stakeholders who expressed both support and opposition. Supporters argued the necessity to curb the proliferation of high-potency THC products in schools and among youths, while opponents warned of the potential negative economic impacts and push towards unregulated markets if such a ban were implemented.

Transcript Highlights:

• on the city or county.
• They're strong, but these things that are going on don't need to go on.

• I respectfully ask that you vote no on Senate Bill

• If anybody ever wants to have coffee and talk about it more one-on-one, I'd love to entertain you.

• At this time, Senate Bill... do you want to try one

Bills: HB5691, SB427, SB2623, SB2858

Keywords: municipal management district, bonds, assessments, property taxes, economic development, eminent domain, special district, Senate Bill 2858, local government, enforcement mechanisms, public safety, due process, city council, urban counties

Summary: The committee convened to discuss Senate Bill 2858, which aims to provide stronger enforcement mechanisms for compliance with state laws by local governments. The bill was met with significant opposition from various stakeholders including city council members and representatives from urban counties. They raised concerns that the provisions threaten local autonomy and could lead to severe financial penalties without due process. Specific testimonies highlighted the potential disruption to local budgets and public safety services due to immediate withholding of funds pending litigation outcomes. As such, the supporting and opposing views were thoroughly debated, reflecting the tension between state authority and local governance.

Transcript Highlights:

• The following conferees: Conference Committee on Senate Bill 457. Chair, Senator Kolkhorst.
• The following conferees: Conference Committee on Senate Bill 3059. Chair, Senator Campbell.
• Motion by Senator Hughes that the Senate grant the request of the House for a conference committee on
• Senator Schwertner moves that the Senate grant the request of the House for a conference committee on
• Senator Middleton moves that the Senate grant the request of the House for a conference committee on

Bills: SJR5, SJR27, SB4, SB6, SB7, SB9, SB13, SB15, SB23, SB27, SB30, SB40, SB57, SB66, SB140, SB268, SB293, SB331, SB413, SB437, SB447, SB457, SB467, SB506, SB510, SB512, SB568, SB571, SB650, SB710, SB763, SB785, SB800, SB850, SB863, SB865, SB904, SB905, SB973, SB974, SB1191, SB1281, SB1300, SB1362, SB1494, SB1504, SB1522, SB1540, SB1567, SB1579, SB1580, SB1610, SB1660, SB1723, SB1760, SB1838, SB1923, SB1946, SB1957, SB1964, SB2018, SB2024, SB2121, SB2167, SB2217, SB2221, SB2321, SB2337, SB2368, SB2373, SB2407, SB2431, SB2477, SB2587, SB2615, SB2753, SB2807, SB2900, SB2965, SB2972, SB2986, SB3039, SB3047, SB3059, SB3070, SB1, SB8, SB12, SB13, SB15, SB17, SB21, SB30, SB37, SB260, SB268, SB331, SB379, SB441, SB447, SB457, SB509, SB650, SB763, SB1198, SB1405, SB1506, SB1566, SB1610, SB1637, SB1660, SB1833, SB2018, SB2024, SB2155, SB2217, SB2308, SB2337, SB2601, SB2753, SB2778, SB2878, SB2900, SB3059, HB4, HB145, HB300, HB493, HB2011, HB2067, HB2516, HB2525, HB2885, HB2974, HB3071, HB3372, HB3595, HB5138, HB5246, HB796, HB1523, HB5294, HB748, HB3395, HB180, HB3171, HB4690, HB146, HB5596, HB5694, HB1135, HB3225, HB186, HB1449, HB3793, HB112, HB104, HB4233, HB1094, HB3336, HB3520, HB3320, HB5663, HB2731, HB2399, HB111, HB3483, HB4580, HB3748, HB632, HB4730, HB127, HB5690, HB5689, HB3385, HB4359, HB5381, HB20, HB123, HB549, HB5606, HB2594, HB1057, HB3664, HCR141, HCR40, HCR59, SJR36, SJR50, SJR63, SCR12, SCR39, SB2023, SB62, SB666, SB847, SB284, SB854, SB810, SB1505, SB583, SB507, SB1434, SB1772, SB2016, SB1122, SB731, SB397, SB508, SB1436, SB287, SB1882, SB393, SB1791, SB209, SB2429, SB1085, SB1975, SB2717, SB1262, SB636, SB2056, SB884, SB1200, SB1845, SB2458, SB801, SB3014, SB3013, SB758, SB2797, SB2076, SB2876, SB1640, SB1449, SB1181, SB1234, SB2926, SB2841, SB1528, SB1854, SB317, SB1250, SB2082, SB1237, SB2819, SB629, SB2608, SB1602, SB2009, SB867, SB640, SB1698, SB2680, SB913, SB1071, SB1086, SB1087, SB1483, SB1444, SB1553, SB1556, SB1703, SB2133, SB2297, SB2298, SB2622, SB2955, SB2334, SB1367, SB2044, SB2363, SB2565, SB1888, SB3036, SB3057, SB3043, SB3063, SB3035, SB203, SB2688, SB2522, SB2459, SB2655, SB2251, SB1884, SB2928, SB2566, SB2549, SB2553, SB2919, SB1944, SB1232, SB1798, SB2603, SB2607, SB2683, SB1319, SB3045, SB3071, HB20, HB127, HB549, HB1094, HB2594, HB2731, HB4233, HB4690, SR625, HCR167, SJR5, SB4, SB6, SB9, SB23, SB40, SB13, SB15, SB30, SB268, SB331, SB447, SB457, SB568, SB650, SB763, SB1540, SB1610, SB1660, SB2018, SB2024, SB2217, SB2337, SB2753, SB2900, SB2972, SB3059, HB4, HB145, HB493, HB2067, HB2516, HB2885, HB2974, HB3071, HB3372, HB3556, HB3595, HB5138

Keywords: bail, felony offenses, criminal justice reform, public safety, constitutional amendment, judicial conduct, state commission, judicial misconduct, commission membership, constitutional amendment, property tax, homestead exemption, school funding, state aid, constitutional amendment, electric power, interconnection, utilities, ERCOT, large load customers

Summary: The meeting of the committee focused on a range of bills addressing various significant issues, notably House Bill 4233 which aims to clarify regulations surrounding digital asset custodians in Texas. This bill stirred considerable dialogue regarding the state's approach to innovative technologies and regulatory clarity versus federal complexities, with members discussing its potential impact on consumers and businesses alike. Additionally, House Bill 4690, which relates to motor fuel standards, was passed after amendments were adopted to ensure clarity between regional compliance requirements, aiding fuel retailers in Texas. The discussions were driven by members such as Senator Zaffirini and Senator Blanco, who provided key insights into their respective bills during the session, which concluded with several motions for conference committees on outstanding legislative measures.

Transcript Highlights:

• We have one bill today.

• It is Senate Bill 66, and I will lay out Senate Bill 66 for Chairman Leach.
• There is a committee substitute, and I'll offer the committee

• Seeing no one desiring to testify, then we'll move on

• We'll close the hearing and I will then withdraw the committee.

Bills: SB66

Keywords: disability, supported decision-making, legal assistance, confidentiality, access to justice, autonomy, civil rights, advocacy, Senate Bill 66, supportive decision-making, disability rights, guardianship reform, legal implications, Attorney-client privilege

Summary: The meeting focused on Senate Bill 66, which addresses supportive decision-making agreements for individuals with disabilities. The bill aims to provide an alternative to full guardianship, allowing those with the ability to make their own choices the supportive assistance they may need. There was a discussion about the implications of authorizing such a supporter during legal proceedings, especially concerning confidentiality and attorney-client privilege. Some concerns were raised regarding how these agreements would work in practice, prompting the committee to consider conducting a study on these legal and ethical implications before proceeding further.